Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 27

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 26 September 28 >

September 27 edit

Template:Copyrighted DC HK edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Masquerading as a "free" license, but places restrictions on commercial usage (meaning anything tagged with this license is eligible for WP:CSD#F3). Furthermore, I'm not even sure the terms described here are accurate. I'd suggest deleting this asap FASTILY 22:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fantastic Four/Frightful Four edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific fancruft Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Famous players generic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:False positive edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Redirect to Template:Falsepositive. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, name is too close to {{Falsepositive}} Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Exploration of Jupiter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Evidence subpage edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no clear use Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Euro coins edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, sprawling, full of trivia Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I think the original idea was to use this template to show each national set of Euro coins, depending on what country was defined. However, due to artistic copyrights on the coin designs, there are no coin images to be shown anymore, hence this template has become useless. --HyperGaruda (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unused, as fas as I can tell all the information (and more) is in the individual Euro coins articles --SuperJew (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Established edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eowp based edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eiza González edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN. One of the singles redirects, and the telenovelas shouldn't be in a musical infobox anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Egk operas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Primefac (talk) 01:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edit0 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unlikely to be used Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since there's a gadget with this function, there is no need anymore to retain this template. --Janezdrilc (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Per the above comment, I have tagged the article for WP:G7 deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Speedy tag reverted. So, in my opinion, delete per nom and template creator. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East Pakistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar/infobox hybrid; East Pakistan has more conventional boxes now. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, content is already in the article. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EAFF Women's Football Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disney India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN anyway. disney.in redirects to the parent article, and Jetix is not India-specific. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disputed-file edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, there are other tags that say the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Discussion in progress edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Discussing. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unlikely to be used. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I've made some improvements to the template's documentation, threw it into an appropriate category, and added it to the list at Template:Done/See also. If "keep" is not preferred, then weak redirect to Template:Discussing. Steel1943 (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to {{Discussing}}, per Steel1943. One of these two should be enough for us. I personally prefer the brevity of the latter's name. —Codename Lisa (talk) 05:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to {{Discussing}}; they serve exactly the same purpose. Merge features/documentation, though, if that applies.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  07:12, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:De minimis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 8#Template:De minimis. Steel1943 (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dated copyvio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; there are far better ways to tag copyright violations Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:TFD#REASONS number 3--unused and not likely to be used. I think the template is old enough that it would have been used by now if it was useful. --Mark viking (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Da-error1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to their respective subpages of User:Denimadept Primefac (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These all appear to be unused forks of the respective templates, with no discernible difference from their unforked forms. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Here's the deal. I use these templates. I worked on keeping them as they are. You want to denegrate the work that makes it easier for me to do my work here, that's your call. I'm not a fan of what you're doing. You just try to make my life harder. It's just this kind of thing which makes people give up on editing Wikipedia. That seems to be your goal. - Denimadept (talk) 08:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • If I recall, the creator of these templates created similar templates in the past (at least one of which was brought up for TfD discussion). If I recall, the consensus in that discussion was "Userfy". Steel1943 (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy without redirect per Steel1943 and previous discussion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I use all these templates. They're subst templates, so they get no sustained links once used. If deleted, I'll find a way to restore them. - Denimadept (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy These are useful templates. If it really bothers you that they're in template mainspace then we can compromise. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The point is that the later version are too friendly. It's silly "delete" arguments like this which really turn me off of Wikipedia. This isn't a major issue, so turning it into one is a waste of time. Justify your argument, TPH. These templates have existed and been used for years before you came along to dispute them. - Denimadept (talk) 03:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cvs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient unused template, no forseeable use, untouched since 2005 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:TFD#REASONS number 3--unused and not likely to be used. I think the template is old enough that it would have been used by now if it was useful. It looks like an experiment with no uptake. --Mark viking (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture of Iran edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture of Iceland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture of Sudan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canberra Capitals roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Primefac (talk) 01:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Leeds Carnegie roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Primefac (talk) 01:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adelaide Lightning roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Primefac (talk) 01:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mohammad Family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Previously deleted draft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shia Imams in History edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox fictional planet edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Doctor Who video games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current-HCOTM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, untouched since 2015 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This project is pinin'; passed on; it is no more; it has ceased to be; it's expired and gone to meet its maker; it's stiff, bereft of life; rests in peace; its pushing up the daisies, its metabolic processes are now history, it's off the twig, kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible; its snuffed it; THIS IS AN EX-PROJECT!! If ever revived → WP:REFUND.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture of Egypt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 7#Template:Culture of Egypt. Steel1943 (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Continental Congressmen of Delaware edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, no other templates in this series. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Conflict of laws topics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly vague Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Composition of the Parliament of Serbia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Alex Shih (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Complex analysis sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per the comments at WikiProject Mathematics ([1] [2]). It's in use now. XOR'easter (talk) 14:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep After bringing this up for discussion a WP:MATH, the nav sidebar is now being used in some complex analysis articles. --Mark viking (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:HEY Keep. Suggest that in the future, prior to wielding the TfD hammer, TenPoundHammer try engaging with an appropriate Wikiproject to seek advice prior to the hostile action of nominating for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh. Do sidebars really have any value that justifies their hugely prominent placement? Sławomir Biały (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but, as said, I second the reservations to unconditionally placing them "relatively prominently" (WP:NAV). Purgy (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Without getting into the question of whether sidebars in general should be used, let us note that this "unused" template is now used, and 123 pages bear the "complex analysis" category tag, and possibly all of them, and certainly many, are pages for which there is no reason why this sidebar should not be used if indeed sidebars should be used. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Communist Party of China edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Civilityfix edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:RPA. Primefac (talk) 01:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, encourages refactoring of other people's comments Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Template:RPA. Seems redundant to that template, considering that yes, we should not be rewording what editors say, but we can hide personal attacks. Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Catholic Commons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, apparently this isn't needed or it would have been used by now. Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CNG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific subset Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - that template is used heavily on Commons and is essential to many ancient history articles including articles I've worked on such as Macrinus or others such as Elagabalus. Only as I look at a TfD for today, do I realize that wikimedia.commons is not linked to en.wiki. Yes, only useful at commons, and not here. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, useful for commons, not useful here. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beeldbank edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not in English Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Battle of Sunset Strip edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parent article redirected, huge linkfarm with no real connection Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Avengers timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Art Nouveau edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear criteria for inclusion Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Previous TfDs for this template:
  • Adding link to previous discussion. – Uanfala 08:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, it's been almost a year since the last discussion and it's still unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Annualevents edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, replaced by {{MonthCategoryNav|topic=events}} Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Algeria squad 1991 Afro-Asian Cup of Nations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn, it was unused at the time and in the unused templates bot, so I failed a spot check here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afd outcome edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unforseeable use Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Essentially redundant to Template:Afd top, but I do not see a reason to redirect there since the nominated template has different functionality, Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - After making it, I later created an improved version: Template:afd star, which shows up to three attempts to vote an article into oblivion. For example:
    War on Women*†, political slogan (deleted, then revived) --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as redundant to AfD top. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Administrator review edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 7#Template:Administrator review. Steel1943 (talk) 22:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_September_27&oldid=1073610738"