Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 2 October 4 >

October 3 edit

Template:Russia Squad EuroBasket 2017 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per WP:TCREEP, as well as prior consensus cited in nom. Teams that do not earn a medal do not need the Wikipedia equivalent of a participation award.—Bagumba (talk) 02:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WSHL labelled map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 12. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-mmawarning edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 12. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-NPR-1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Have immense potential and an inherent need.And these are used (even if rarely). (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 11:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

None of these appear to have ever been used. Keeping in mind that they have been subst'd, searching for the phrases in these warnings turns up very few results. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Kudpung, DGG, and I are the most common people who deal with inexperienced users doing things such as tagging archbishops for A7 deleting and taggbombing municipalities. These are very useful when a warning is needed to be given, and I think Floq inquired to Kudpung about adapting them for recent changes recently. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep . These are being proposed for deletion simply because they exist. The purpose for which they have been designed is not even a year old yet and the number of reviewers is till growing. With ACTRIAL in place we will now be able to turn more of our attention to the issue of poor reviewing and these templates are likely to be used much more often. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as inherently of use, and iof probable increasing use, and trout for nominator on their timing... — fortunavelut luna 07:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. As ACTRIAL is underway, these templates will be needed to inform new users who are not in the the New page reviewers group of the qualifications they need to review new articles. Mduvekot (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Utah County Labelled Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unprod2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 12. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US tornadoes by month edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, outdated Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The template doesn't specify which year. Steel1943 (talk) 03:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Template's source is unverifiable (404 not found), it's unused and not likely to be used, and it's been abandoned for almost a decade. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UNGL Stadiums edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, league defunct since 2010 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transversity edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no reason to hardcode this Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Traditional Song boilerplate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused boilerplate, goes into far too many details for an article. Is "Broadsides" or "Songs that refer to" going to be relevant? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too small edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:SNOW. No rationale other than "unused". KMF (talk) 02:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Toomanyflags edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Previous discussion from June closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @KATMAKROFAN: So you're saying a "no consensus" should not be relisted ever? The lack of consensus is exactly why I relisted this. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since this template could be placed on almost all international sports-related articles; the use of many flags on those articles is intentional. Steel1943 (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It might come in handy, and it isn't taking up much space. --John (talk) 05:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @John: WP:ITSUSEFUL is not a valid rationale, try again. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • It isn't being used at present but if it is needed in the future, it'll be easier if it hasn't been deleted. AKA, it might come in handy. --John (talk) 22:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, has been used in the past, and may be used in the future. Frietjes (talk) 23:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Todis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Electrocution first period edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Time zones of Denmark edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swans (band) graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, just subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sutiya dynasty edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why do I keep forgetting that you can redirect. Mr rnddude (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Subscribe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, doesn't seem like it's useful Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stub redirect edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep. Just because a template is unused right now doesn't mean it will be unused in the future. KMF (talk) 01:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Surprisingly enough this template is redundant to {{Article for deletion}}. That, and Wikipedia:Stubs for redirection, a place to start such discussions, doesn't exist and shouldn't. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, as indicated above, the process is (1) boldly redirect it and (if that is disputed) (2) take it to WP:AFD, or (3) start a discussion and tag the article with {{Merge to}}. this template is not part of the process. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Streets in Orange County edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a proper navigational aid, as most of these redirect to state highway articles Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_3&oldid=1073610656"