Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 20

< June 19	June 21 >

June 20 edit

Template:Second Life screenshot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Second Life screenshot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's an unused template. The category of the same name needs to be looked at too. N. Harmonik (talk) 16:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
which category are you talking about?68.151.25.115 (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The category of the same name has now been deleted. N. Harmonik (talk) 19:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Second Life screenshot was never deleted68.151.25.115 (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pizzetti operas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pizzetti operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates Template:Ildebrando Pizzetti Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USSenateLeaders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USSenateLeaders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in two articles, Template:US Senate leaders current is used in the articles and is a more updated one. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 08:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete or redirect to Template:US Senate leaders current. Frietjes (talk) 21:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anna Anthropy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 30. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anna Anthropy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sandwiches edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 30. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sandwiches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture of South Ossetia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 30. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Culture of South Ossetia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar, parent article has been redirected Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cultural Leonesa squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cultural Leonesa squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, any content can be put on {{Cultural y Deportiva Leonesa}} Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Since when a squad template can be included in a team template? Besides, the template is 100% valid through WP:FPL, since Cultural is the new Segunda División team. The same happened with UE Llagostera, Sevilla Atlético, Lorca FC and so on. MYS 77 ^✉ 18:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: the template is far from being unused, as well. MYS 77 ^✉ 19:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, it looks like TenPoundHammer didn't check "what links here" before trying to have it deleted. Frietjes (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of voting systems edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. after merging the history Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Comparison of voting systems (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unsourced OR Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

history merge with Template:Comparison of Schulze to preferential voting systems. Frietjes (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ELNO edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ELNO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded, overly laconic warning that reeks of WP:BITE, also unused. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I use it. I am happy to move it to my personal space. Also happy to take suggestions on improving the wording. I am a big fan of brevity and see it as a plus rather than a negative.

By the way it is used by "subst" not directly... Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We have the uw-spam templates, and we should use them instead. (Also, it looks to me like the section header does not render properly.) --Tryptofish (talk) 23:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The links are not necessarily spam, they are often just not appropriate per ELNO. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but although the templates are named uw-spam as a sort of shorthand, the actual wording of the messages covers that. --Tryptofish (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

move to userspace. nothing wrong with it, but per this search, Doc James is the only one using it. Frietjes (talk) 22:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- - Sure I am happy with that. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diffneeded edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete , if you want it, just ask and I will restore it. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Diffneeded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2006. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

comment, clearly substituted, so what is the evidence that it's not being used? (e.g., this search returns results) Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Power movement edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Black Power movement (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sord edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sord (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Comma swap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

G6 declined. Clearly broken. Dependent on an also unused template, which is also listed here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As I stated in my G6 declination edit summary, this template is completely dependent on Template:Comma swap, which is also unused, and you may want to add it to this nomination. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subst only. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 07:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, I have added some documentation. Frietjes (talk) 14:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:J. K. Amalou edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:J. K. Amalou (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tom Ford edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tom Ford (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AR report edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AR report (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and inactive Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ARB-No edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARB-No (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2009, hardcodes a bunch of text Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete use unclear68.151.25.115 (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSRT-Yes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CSRT-Yes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unsed, hardcodes a bunch of text Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ADPL LegCo members edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ADPL LegCo members (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one link, unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete one link does not warrant a navigation box68.151.25.115 (talk) 01:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1939 shipwrecks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1939 shipwrecks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).