Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 10

January 10 edit

Template:FIRS Inline Hockey World Championships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is mostly red links and several of the ones that are not red could become red soon due to AfDs. Most of the places where it is used are the same articles up for AfD. It mostly defines what was to have been a huge sprawling walled garden of non-notable articles but most of them were either deleted or never made. There seems to be no scope for this subject to have most of these articles so the template seems to have no value. DanielRigal (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Main section edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 18 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

College soccer awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 18 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grantham University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template not used for navigation of Grantham University topic. Links aren't directly associated with Grantham (e.g. accrediting agencies and one associated person.) Article has had problems with marketing and peakcockery. The Grantham University page is the only one displaying the template. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OVERVIEW OF STAINING edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted article in wrong namespace, CSD A10 would apply as well RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article in template space. Redundant to Bacteria. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OBJECTIVES edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted wrong namespace, appears to be an essay

WP:FAKEARTICLE substub. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:INTRODUCTION edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted wrong namespace, appears to be an essay RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spam KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:San Antonio Scorpions squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Squad template of now-defunct soccer team. Darkhan Aqtöbe (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Club is now defunct so there's no need for a squad template. – Michael (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a defunct club does not need a 'current' squad. GiantSnowman 08:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NBA minutes leaders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 18 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ESPNRISE 2000s All-Decade boys basketball team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 18 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).