Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 July 20

< July 19	July 21 >

July 20 edit

Template:Dreezy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dreezy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As it stands, this navbox isn't necessary as it does not enhance or improve upon navigation. No prejudice against recreation if sufficient related articles are created. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as premature per nom and as redundant to basic links unless more related articles are created —PC-XT+ 04:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too few links to justify a navbox. -- Whpq (talk) 21:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tüür operas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tüür operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough navigation links (only two). MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...and one is the main composer page: delete as premature or redundant to basic links —PC-XT+ 04:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Recoys edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No-one has asked for this to be placed in their userspace, but I would consider it appropriate to request userfying at WP:REFUND. Any admin may complete such a request without consulting me. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Recoys (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links for navigation. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or userfy for now as premature until more articles are created —PC-XT+ 04:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).