Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 29

< January 28	January 30 >

January 29 edit

Template:Bexleyheath Line (modern route) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant to {{Bexleyheath Line}} Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bexleyheath Line (modern route) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - {{Bexleyheath Line}} is sufficient to depict this line and, in any event, the route does not strictly extend beyond Lewisham as shown here. Lamberhurst (talk) 11:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2015 Africa Cup of Nations finalists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unneeded Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2015 Africa Cup of Nations finalists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

just not needed. Koppapa (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After a review of this template, its history, and its primary linked article, I can now see why it is "just not needed." The navbox was formerly used in the parent article, 2015 Africa Cup of Nations, where all of the team articles linked in the navbox are already prominently linked in the main body text. Furthermore, it is not a "2015" navbox; all of the included links are to the main articles for the national football teams of the African countries involved, not the 2015 editions of those teams. Navboxes such as this simply contribute to the bottom-of-the-page cruft which has exploded across many of our sports articles in the last four or five years, without providing any additional useful links or information for the reader. @Koppapa: In the future, some further explanation of the reasons for your proposed deletion would be helpful for TfD discussion participants. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.