Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 11

< February 10	February 12 >

February 11 edit

Template:F(x) singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge singles in to the main template, no quorum for a rename Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:F(x) singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:F(x) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:F(x) singles with Template:F(x).
There aren't enough song articles for a separate template. "Chocolate Love" is nominated for deletion, and there are two links to "Hot Summer". That leaves only three songs in this template. Random86 (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as suggested; too few links. Alakzi (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to {{f(x) (band)}} per main article at f(x) (band) because this is not about mathematical functions -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 06:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to name matching the article per IP —PC-XT+ 14:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WA Entertainment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no quorum, no objections to deletion: may be restored through WP:REFUND Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WA Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox has six links in it. Three are artists under the company/label, and three are other record labels the company is partnered with. The main purpose of the template seems to be to link the three artist pages together. Is that really necessary? Random86 (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Almost nothing to present, very few links. Hajme (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Open World Entertainment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no quorum and no objections to deletion. May be recovered through WP:REFUND. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Open World Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox has five links in it. Four are artists under the company/label (one of those is a redirect), and one is another record label the company is partnered with. The main purpose of the template seems to be to link the three artist pages together, which is unnecessary in my opinion. Random86 (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Logi Entertainment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no quorum and no objection to deletion. Recreation can go through WP:REFUND Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Logi Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another navbox with only three links. The company and artists have links to each other, and I don't think this is necessary. Random86 (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:J. Tune Camp edit

Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_19#Template:J._Tune_Camp. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Illionaire Records edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was 'no quorum, no objection to deletion. May be undeleted through WP:REFUND Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Illionaire Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox has only four links in it and isn't really necessary. The artists are already linked to their label in their infoboxes. Random86 (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Baljunso edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as not sufficiently useful as a navigational aid. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Baljunso (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox has only three links in it and isn't really serving a useful purpose. Random86 (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Very few links, could be instead mentioned on article. Hajme (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest stable software release/X.Org Server edit

Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 19#Template:Latest stable software release/X.Org Server. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Starship Entertainment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no quorum, with no objections to deletion. May be restored through WP:REFUND. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Starship Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't think these articles need to be linked together with a navbox. The company article lists the artists already, and the artists' pages link to the company. Random86 (talk) 08:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Satellite awards edit

Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_19. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]