Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 March 7

< March 6	March 8 >

March 7 edit

Template:NZ PCbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NZ PCbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cantybox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantybox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Cantybox header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chavalit Yongchaiyudh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chavalit Yongchaiyudh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non of the blue links are directly related to the subject in a way that warrants inclusion in a navbox. Paul_012 (talk) 12:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. since it is only used in one article, the text in the article should be enough for the current one-way linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Somchai Wongsawat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Somchai Wongsawat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non of the blue links are directly related to the subject in a way that warrants inclusion in a navbox. Paul_012 (talk) 12:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. since it is only used in one article, the text in the article should be enough for the current one-way linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Samak Sundaravej edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Samak Sundaravej (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non of the blue-links are directly related to the subject in a way that warrants inclusion in a navbox. Paul_012 (talk) 12:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. since it is only used in one article, the text in the article should be enough for the current one-way linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anand Panyarachun edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anand Panyarachun (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non of the blue-links are directly related to the subject in a way that warrants inclusion in a navbox. Paul_012 (talk) 12:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. since it is only used in one article, the text in the article should be enough for the current one-way linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chuan Leekpai edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chuan Leekpai (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non of the blue-links are directly related to the subject in a way that warrants inclusion in a navbox. Paul_012 (talk) 12:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. since it is only used in one article, the text in the article should be enough for the current one-way linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Suchinda Kraprayoon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suchinda Kraprayoon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non of the blue-links are directly related to the subject in a way that warrants inclusion in a navbox. Paul_012 (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. since it is only used in one article, the text in the article should be enough for the current one-way linking. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phraya Manopakorn Nititada edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phraya Manopakorn Nititada (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Links only tangentially related to subject or non-existent. A navbox isn't warranted here. Four other similar templates have been deleted. Paul_012 (talk) 09:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with nom. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William 14:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Television Awards in India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Television Awards in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template should be renamed to "Film and Television Awards in India" as it also covers film's and not just television's awards. Is this the right place for renames? I understand that it is as its "Template for discussion" and not "Template for deletion". §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you could use a general renaming venue, but I'll say move with redirect —PC-XT+ 11:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~It should be merged with {{Infobox film awards}}, to make a generic film-and-televison awards infobox. More~~ generally, simple renames don't need to be brought here; simply do them, or raise first on the template;s talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am agreed with both Dharmadhyaksha and PC-XT about renaming/ moving the Navbox. I am little confused how this Navbox can be merged with an Infobox as suggested by Andy Mabbett.--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry; I misread the above and confused it with another template. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The template is made as per the requirements. The repeated articles are converted into one and has been made as suggested by you. Hence, I would like you to remove the tag "Templates for Deletion". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.223.99.105 (talk) 10:10, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.