Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 4

< May 3	May 5 >

May 4 edit

Template:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I was about to remove the ridiculous entries for Diana, Princess of Wales as her "mother in law" and Camilla as her "step mother in law" then it occurred to me that the whole template was just preposterous nonsense. I mean shall we list the Queen Mum as her "great grand mother-in-law"? This is quite useless. No doubt a royal family navigation box will be on her bio, and that's enough. Scott Mac 23:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And yet you saw fit to add her dog? This seems a bit inconsistent. In any case keep the template as a useful way of navigating around Middleton articles. St Anselm (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An identical one for Prince William (revering the "in law" and natural family polarity) is on those same articles. It just looks ridiculous.--Scott Mac 00:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pure template cruft. These are supposed to be for navigation - why would anyone want to jump immediately between the article on her dress, to the one about her title in NI, or between the one on her mother in law Camilla, and her sister Pippa. MickMacNee (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are templates created for less important subject, yet those were considered notable. But more importantly, a whole separate Middleton family page is way too much, but a simpler template instead is useful enough for navigating around Middleton articles. Others, like Diana, Princess of Wales also has an own navigation box. Mr. D. E. Mophon (talk) 11:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of the subject is not pertinent here. Navigation templates for a bunch of low-notability articles would be fine. The consideration is "usefulness". This template is not useful, as it is identical to {{Prince William, Duke of Cambridge}} (simply swapping the brother for "brother in law" etc.) and is applicable to exactly the same articles. Is anyone really needing to navigate between Princess Diana and James Middleton anyway? Any useful navigation links are well covered by the multiplicity of templates that appear on all royal articles. The template adds nothing useful, and is just cruft and bloat.--Scott Mac 11:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline keep I see some usefulness in this and no harm. In reply to "why would anyone want to jump immediately between the article on her dress, to the one about her title in NI, or between the one on her mother in law Camilla, and her sister Pippa", the answer is surely that having read one page, people are motivated to turn to a related page. Indeed, that's the nature of the world wide web. Moonraker2 (talk) 07:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't answer the issue of duplication of {{Prince William, Duke of Cambridge}}.--Scott Mac 12:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No. The likelyhood that someone reading the article about the dress would then want to read about Camilla is as likely as them wanting to read the article about weddings in general. There's nothing about this template that serves realistic navigation demands around an identified central topic. It's decorative but ultimately useless cruft, pure and simple. MickMacNee (talk) 18:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If we follow the logic that led to the creation of this template, then basically every article would get an accompanying template that would then have to appear on all related articles. As a result, all our articles would be full of completely useless template cruft, even worse than most nobility articles are already. (Way more templates than content.) Such templates are supposed to connect articles with a strong common theme. This template connects articles with two common themes that are related only through one person.
Seriously, it's just common sense that we don't have extra templates for single persons unless there is a huge amount of articles on them, as opposed to just relatives. Hans Adler 07:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it seems the William of Wales template has this all covered anyway, so this is largely a duplicate of that template. Bob talk 13:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am not seeing a policy-based argument for deletion above. Where and how the template is used in particular articles is a matter for the editors of those articles. Templates are just an editorial convenience, saving on repetitive edits, and if templates are used in multiple articles, as this one is, then their function is valid. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't need a "policy based reason". We are not a bureaucracy. All we need is a common sense reason. The reason is that thus is basically a duplicate of the "William one" - it has essentially the same content and belongs on essentially the same articles. Redundancy is a perfectly valid reason to delete. And unless some keep voters refute that argument, on a metric of improving the encyclopedia, then this debate has an obvious conclusion.--Scott Mac 20:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William clearly deserves his own nav template. If the biographies of the in-laws are to remain there, as seems standard, the only article specifically devoted to the missus is the one about her wedding dress. That article is easily accessible from (and may well in future be merged to) the wedding one. As such, the massive overlap between this template and {{Prince William, Duke of Cambridge}} would seem to far exceed any navigational benefit. Delete. Skomorokh 07:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In my view a perfectly valid and useful template on a highly notable topic of interest to a great many readers. However greater restraint should be exercised in adding detail, to prevent duplication of the templates for other members of the Royal Family. In my view the Family section of this template should not go further than her husband, parents and siblings. Rangoon11 (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary duplicate of the template for her husband, so any instances can be replaced with that (where they don't both appear on the same article).--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hans Adler. Template cruft, essentially duplicated by {{Prince William, Duke of Cambridge}}. --ddima .talk 18:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Episode list unused sub-pages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Episode list/24 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/7th Heaven (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Avatar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Avatar1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Avatar2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Avatar3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Battlestar Galactica (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Burn Notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Friends (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/FriendsS1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Futurama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Hercules (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/House (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/House/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Jericho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Lost (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Lost/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/LostS4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Miss Marple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Numb3rs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Prison Break (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Prison Break1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/QuestionTime (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Sea Patrol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Seinfeld (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Star Trek: The Original Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Stargate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Stargate SG-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Supernatural (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Supernatural/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/Supernatural/doc/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/The O.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/The Office (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/The Office/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/The Strip (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/The Wire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/casualty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list/casualty/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list2/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Episode list (no image) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Colbert episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete as unused: All are sub-pages of {{Episode list}} (except for the last in the list) and redirect to that template. This excessive list also floods the documentation page of that article with redirects that loop back to it making the few remaining valid templates get lost in the crowd, so to speak. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 22:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Commercial logo rationale edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Commercial logo rationale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Although this is meant to be subst, I feel it is redundant to {{Logo fur}}. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - also very similar to the {{logo rationale}} template. Anyway, no objection to deletion as template creator. PhilKnight (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WhoseMap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WhoseMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Self-Nom : This was created with the intent of trying to improve the attribution given to map represented data. Namely that the base-map used was attributed as well as the data source. Partly developed because of concerns about 'database' right in Geo-Data. I'm not sure this template is the right approach and hence this nom. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WhoseData edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WhoseData (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Self Nom: This is used on a small number of images. However, I'm not sure it's the best approach to use in ensuring that the Data source as well as physical source of an image is attributed. Partly developed because of differences in 'database' rights between the UK and US. Is a template like this actually needed? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uw-photo-advisory edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-photo-advisory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Self-nom : This was originally drafted as an attempt to have a polite user note to leave when placing a 'quality' concern on a file description page in relation to an image. However there doesn't seem to have been any development work done it. I am nominating this to TfD so that I can get feedback, as to the actual need or otherwise for a template like this.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USgovt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USgovt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused redirect to existing {{PD-USGov}} . Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sofades edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sofades (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, all settlements in the template are red links. Markussep ^Talk 08:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Actinium edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn Frietjes (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Actinium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_April_11#Template:Protactinium. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep all the element templates per This, that and the other. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw - per previous TfD... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Academic degrees of Denmark edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Academic degrees of Denmark (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:About plugcomputer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete - useless article content in template namespace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:About plugcomputer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Content not a template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Abkhazian railway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, now in use. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abkhazian railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the article Abkhazian railway where it belongs. That seemed obvious. Sw2nd (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ARD-12 class floating dry dock edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARD-12 class floating dry dock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apparently the template was replaced with {{Auxiliary repair dock (ARD)}} Brad (talk) 06:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:APRA party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:APRA party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:09, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ALeague AIS colour edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ALeague AIS colour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ALPB roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ALPB roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AIM 50 companies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AIM 50 companies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AFL player statistics legend edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL player statistics legend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AFL event edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AFLCA Champion Player of the Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFLCA Champion Player of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now in use. The-Pope (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw per The-Pope (talk), Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AF1 team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AF1 team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ACTAFLclubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ACTAFLclubs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AB-Kreuz edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AB-Kreuz (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AB-FedRep edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AB-FedRep (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chloride edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chloride (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chlorides edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chlorides (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chopin works edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chopin works (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I made this, thinking I'd add it to all the various articles. But it's kind of big. Suggestions for something to do with it are welcome. Stevage 03:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy; potentially worthy, and Stevage indicates he is willing to work on it. Skomorokh 07:07, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Christian Democratic MP 2006-2010 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Christian Democratic MP 2006-2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite Audio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite Audio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite Compert Con Culainn II edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite Compert Con Culainn II (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template is in use now. Cavila (talk) 09:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw in use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite TBDD II edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite TBDD II (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template is in use now. Cavila (talk) 09:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw in use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite gni edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite gni (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite note-15 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite note-15 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete boilerplate text with clear-as-mud name. 184.144.163.181 (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:A-PL-nr edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:35, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A-PL-nr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:A-PL-header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A-PL-header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2010-11 Hockey East standings (men) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2010-11 Hockey East standings (men) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009–10 AIHL Champions Cup bracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009–10 AIHL Champions Cup bracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009-10 OUA hockey East standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009-10 OUA hockey East standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007–08 Big 12 women's basketball standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2007–08 Big 12 women's basketball standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template? Please help clear the backlog at: Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007 Vanderbilt Commodores baseball game log edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2007 Vanderbilt Commodores baseball game log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:40, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EmperorsCupBracketR1R3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EmperorsCupBracketR1R3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template MicroX (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I completely forgot about that one. Must have nominated for speedy deletion myself. —WiJG ? 07:27, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EmperorsCupBracketLast16 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EmperorsCupBracketLast16 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. MicroX (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the above. —WiJG ? 07:27, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USSCOTW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USSCOTW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is no longer needed. The US Southern Wikipedians Collaboration of the month never really took off and died out some years ago. No articles link to this template. Kumioko (talk) 03:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AtlantaCollaboration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AtlantaCollaboration (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. No meaningful edits in a couple years. The atlanta collaboration never really took and this template is unneeded. Kumioko (talk) 03:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:3~ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:3~ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template with no associated documentation. Unlikely to be used. Kumioko (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep three tildes have special meaning in wikicode, so is impossible to type. Therefore a template is necessary to enter them. For ~~~ produces this: 64.229.100.153 (talk) when I type it. 64.229.100.153 (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the template does not have a deletion template on it. 64.229.100.153 (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:5~ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:5~ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that has no documentation. Its unlikley to be used Kumioko (talk) 03:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep five tildes have special meaning in wikicode, so is impossible to type. Therefore a template is necessary to enter them. For ~~~~~ produces this: 05:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC) when I type it. 64.229.100.153 (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the template does not have a deletion template on it. 64.229.100.153 (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-PRGov-IPC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-PRGov-IPC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template based on inadequate OTRS communication. Per WMF counsel "the reasons given in the email are not by themselves sufficient to establish that the photographs are in the public domain". See the related discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 March 28#File:Roberto Clemente4.jpg VernoWhitney (talk) 14:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Good faith and due diligence all around, but unfortunately it's just not a usable release. Our correspondent seems to have been thinking specifically only about whether the Puerto Rican government asserted any claim to the images. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lamentably there seems to be no alternative. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.