Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 September 5

< September 4	September 6 >

September 5 edit

Template:Infobox Region of Ethiopia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Region of Ethiopia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Broken and basically redundant to {{Infobox region}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to {{Infobox region}}. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 19:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unused anyways. Pichpich (talk) 20:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 07:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox mattlobato edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox mattlobato (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template should really be on an article as it would only ever be used in one location. However, an article for Bruno Motta doesn't even exist either, so template should just be deleted. WOSlinker (talk) 16:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary. Imzadi 1979 → 07:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Spellchecker edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by Athaenara (talk · contribs) as a WP:CSD#T3. RL0919 (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spellchecker (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is broken; the spellchecker option is giving me 403s because cmackenzie's toolserver account had expired. Since the template is useless now, I suggest that we delete it. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It is hard or impossible now to tell how much it was transcluded, but certainly not functioning now. Anyone relying on it in old versions of IE should upgrade their browser instead of trying to use this stop-gap. I'm not sure who took over that component (where it was moved to, probably Hippietrail's?) but there are many better solutions out there, anyhow. --Connel MacKenzie - wikt 09:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as less than useful now. Imzadi 1979 → 07:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this old hack, per author's request. —I-20 the highway 03:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb team Omiya Ardija edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team Omiya Ardija (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template which has no content anyways. Pichpich (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Pichpich. CrowzRSA 23:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless. Imzadi 1979 → 07:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.