Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 22 February 24 >

February 23 edit

Template:NextMoonTime edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NextMoonTime (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unlikely to be used (used in Current Moon below). VernoWhitney (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Current moon Formating edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current moon Formating (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unlikely to be used(used in Current Moon below). VernoWhitney (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the fullness of the moon and its graphical representation seems to work. The hardcoded portion (next moon) should be deleted, since it doesn't work, but I could see this being used on a portal. Or the Phases of the moon article... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Current Moon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current Moon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unlikely to be used. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This also relied upon a vandalized Template:B which I've since reverted. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment an interesting template, I wonder if it's right. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Don't know where the editor was going with this, but he's now banned and the current version presents useless hardcoded information. Plus the current fullness of the moon hardly seems like a useful thing for an encyclopedia even if it worked. --RL0919 (talk) 17:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the fullness of the moon and its graphical representation seems to work. The hardcoded portion (next moon) should be deleted, since it doesn't work, but I could see this being used on a portal. Or the Phases of the moon article... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPAVIATION creator/Airport/content edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. RL0919 (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPAVIATION creator/Airport/content (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep this is a preload template for an article creator wizard. Since it is a substitution template, it will never appear to be used. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn Obviously, I was too hasty and ignorant with some of these nominations. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tôlanaro graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tôlanaro graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - unused, and doesn't work properly. Robofish (talk) 02:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Weekday edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to {{WEEKDAY}} Magioladitis (talk) 10:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weekday (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Virtually orphaned, broken. Must be superseded by some template (I'm not sure what the purpose of this is; to mention the day of the week? Why is this useful?) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made it so long ago that I no longer remember its function. Go ahead and delete it, if you're sure that none of the templates using it are still needed. --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It appears that the purpose of this is indeed to figure out the day of the week. See for example the infoboxes of Autism Sunday and Thanksgiving (United States). VernoWhitney (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not actually broken as far as I can tell. The expression error warning appears on the template page because it uses functions that are not valid without inputs, and the inputs are fields that only have values when it is transcluded. It is used in several other templates. Some of those appear to be unused and should probably be deleted themselves, but at least one ({{Weekday in month}}) is used in a number of articles. Deleting this template would break that one. --RL0919 (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC) Update: If the uses of the template are replaced as recommended by Plastikspork, I have no objection to deletion. --RL0919 (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This template is basically redundant to {{WEEKDAY}}. The only different between the two is that this one adds 1 to the output to produce a number from 1 to 7, rather than 0 to 6. Given that it is confusing to have two templates of the same name, but alternative case, and that this template is only used inside of other templates, all transclusions of {{weekday|YYYY|MM|DD}} could be easily replaced by ({{WEEKDAY|YYYY|MM|DD}} + 1), which would orphan this template. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Plastikspork. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 04:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to {{WEEKDAY}} to avoid it being recreated. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Unit of length/SI3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was SNOWball keep, as the reasoning behind the nomination is obviously mistaken. The template is part of the {{Unit of length}} template, specifically the part which allows conversions to three significant figures, and is not broken. Any deletion discussion should be for {{Unit of length}}, not for individual subtemplates. Physchim62 (talk) 13:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unit of length/SI3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned (one transclusion), broken. Must be superseded by some template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sandbox graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sandbox graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SupremeCourtListRow edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep for now, pending the possible use of the table in an article. RL0919 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SupremeCourtListRow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment it works fine, did you even examine these, or is this generated by some sort of bot? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It does work fine. It is crucial to the operation of THIS page. (Which has not been moved to the main page due to the slow speed at which it moves.) Jrkenti (talk) 19:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The table needs help - it loads too slowly, maybe someone here knows how to fix it?Jrkenti (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Percent to color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Percent to color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment well it did work until the TfD template was added to it, at which time it became broken. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment here is a working example, with the removal of the TfD template: Template talk:Percent Cell/testcases . 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Justin is wrong about the "broken" part (from other discussions, I don't think he realized that a template could show errors in its untranscluded state but work just fine when transcluded), but the fact that this template is three years old and its only use is in one old talk page archive suggests that it isn't really needed. --RL0919 (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Percent Cell edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Percent Cell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment well it did work until the TfD template was added to it, at which time it became broken. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment here is a working example, with the removal of the TfD template: Template talk:Percent Cell/testcases . 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Justin is wrong about the "broken" part (from other discussions, I don't think he realized that a template could show errors in its untranscluded state but work just fine when transcluded), but the fact that this template is three years old and its only use is in one old talk page archive suggests that it isn't really needed. --RL0919 (talk) 18:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NSWPL 2008 JWC Pool B Ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NSWPL 2008 JWC Pool B Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, outdated. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NSWPL 2008 JWC Pool A Ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NSWPL 2008 JWC Pool A Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, outdated. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NSWPL 2008 JWC Pool A Ladder2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NSWPL 2008 JWC Pool A Ladder2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Transcludes into two orphaned (and apparently outdated) templates. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - unused and outdated. Robofish (talk) 02:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Molad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Molad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken. I would like to know if there is a Hebrew calendar converter template that works, though... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As template author, I apologize for leaving this work unfinished. In fact, I have "fixed" it for now, although there appears to be a bug (it is sometimes off by 1 helek). Since my attention has been brought back to it, I would like the opportunity to make this into a working Hebrew date converter. So, keep. --Eliyak T·C 02:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Justin for mentioning this tfd on my talk page. --Eliyak T·C 02:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just noticed that the parserfunction {{#time}} has been installed, with Hebrew date capabilities (see mw:Help:Extension:ParserFunctions#.23time), which makes this template somewhat redundant. I have fixed it, however, and it does what it is supposed to; it calculates the molad Tishrei for any year. Whether we need it or not I shall leave up to others' discretion. Notice also the related templates {{Molad/calculate}}, {{Molad/format}}, {{Molad/1}} and {{Total chalakim}}. --Eliyak T·C 09:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused and redundant to parser functions, and thanks to Eliyak for researching that. The sub-pages should go with it, but since {{Total chalakim}} is an independent template, it should probably be nominated separately if desired. --RL0919 (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MCOTWnew/test edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by Wouterstomp (talk · contribs). RL0919 (talk) 00:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MCOTWnew/test (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, errors. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I planned to improve the template but never finished the work. I have deleted the page. --WS (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anime r edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. The associated category will also be deleted as a WP:CSD#G8. RL0919 (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anime r (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fairly pointless and redundant template being randomly added to a few anime article redirects. Such redirects are already better categorized by the talk page param in the project box and through the use of more generalized templates. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The fact that it currently houses few articles, doesn't mean it doesn't have potential, and there are many anime and manga related redirects uncategorized in that sense. They would be good for tracking. Additionally, on most redirects I added this category, there is no "better categorization" on their talk pages - they're just red links, and I doubt anyone would bother to sort the talk pages of redirects rather than the main namespace. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if it falls under WP:OTHERSTUFF, but there are other tracking templates related to specific subjects that are not contested. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redundant to Wikiproject banner on talk pages. Anime Addict, please try to discuss ideas more before investing time in doing something which may not be perceived as useful by others. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the last remark, I'm sure I have also told you how to conduct your behavior on a wiki... in a past life or something. I'm also sure you like these kinds of personal comments addressed to you too. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 02:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What shall we do with the existing tranclusions? Delete or replace? -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the transclusions, and replace with a {{anime|class=redirect}} onto the talk page. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-PRGovt-Art edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by User:Marine 69-71 14:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-PRGovt-Art (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PDOMG#Puerto_Rico_Template:PD-PRGov - BUT let's discuss BEFORE deleting! Please hold off 2 weeks. Elvey (talk) 11:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment- As creator of the template, I totally agree with Elvey in the discussion. I believe that Elvey is kind enough, from our interactions, to help me look for the proper solution. Tony the Marine (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Geolinks-AU-streetscale edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geolinks-AU-streetscale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Full of errors and likely redundant of another Geolinks template (possibly {{Coord}}). I am pretty ignorant about these geographic templates, but I believe that anything accomplished by this Australia-specific template could be done by a more generic one. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

222 tranclusions atm. Who's gonna orphan it? -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See {{Being deleted}}. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the close is "Delete", I'd be happy to help replace the transclusions. Just leave me a note on my talk page. --RL0919 (talk) 20:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Geolinks-US-river edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geolinks-US-river (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template, full of ParserFunction errors. Other articles (e.g. Amazon River and Mississippi River) accomplish a similar goal with {{Geobox}}. I don't see why there should be a template just for American rivers. Currently has c. 50 transclusions. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redundant to {{Coord}}, which could replace it in the existing transclusions, or better yet, add the much more robust {{Geobox}} as suggested in the nom. --RL0919 (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
45 transclusions. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South African location maps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. RL0919 (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map South Africa Gauteng (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Western Cape (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa KwaZulu-Natal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Mpumalanga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Western Cape Cape Town (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa North West (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Limpopo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Free State (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Northern Cape (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map South Africa Eastern Cape (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These can be merged to {{Location map South Africa}}, with a field for the state that brings up the name, border coordinates, image, and map center. Unless I'm mistaken, there's no need for 10 separate templates per state and one generic one. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken; that would not work with the {{Location map}} system, which these templates are part of. If you look at Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Location map you will see that it is absolutely standard to have various Location map templates for country subdivisions. - htonl (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So, make that an explicit Keep for me, unless the nominator is going to explain how his proposed merge would work with {{Location map}} and, for example, the pushpin_map field in {{Infobox settlement}}. I should note, also, that I have <noinclude>'d the {{afd}} templates on these templates, because they caused horrible breakage on all the articles where these were used with {{Location map}}. - htonl (talk) 02:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I figured that a field could be added to {{Location map South Africa}} to bring up these maps, coordinates, etc. E.g. Province = Limpopo. I have to admit my ignorance at how that kind of modification would be made to the template, but I've no doubt that it can be done. If it is too labor-intensive to be worthwhile, then forget it. Also, thanks for finishing what I started and then somehow forgot to do myself. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is not so much with {{Location map South Africa}} but with how they're used as part of the {{Location map}} system and that in turn is used in Infobox templates. The first parameter to {{Location map}} identifies which map template to use; if you were to force all the South Africa maps into a single template then you would have to add an extra parameter to {{Location map}} to pass that new parameter, and then you would have to add corresponding parameters to all the Infobox templates that use {{Location map}}. Apart from the work involved, and the complications it would add for users of the pushpin maps, this would all of course be prone to the introduction of error. Anyway, the current system works very well, and there's no particular need to cut down on the number of templates anyway. Wikipedia is not paper.
The bottom line is, you're essentially proposing a major restructuring of how the {{Location map}} system would work, and the appropriate place to do that is not at TFD.- htonl (talk) 05:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location map USA Washington D.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 13:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map USA Washington D.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan. There is also no need for a template to map locations on such a small locality. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom, not used and not useful. Robofish (talk) 02:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location map Russia3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete per G7. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map Russia3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per author request. This template is a forgotten test. --Obersachse (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jasper Janssen/timeline graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jasper Janssen/timeline graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subpage of a non-existent template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - it's not really clear what this is for, but whatever it is, it doesn't seem to work. Robofish (talk) 02:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location map Russia2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted per WP:CSD#G7. RL0919 (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map Russia2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per author request. This template is a forgotten test. --Obersachse (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ja Pref Route Sign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ja Pref Route Sign (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Apparently redundant of {{Infobox road}} (cf. Category:Toll roads in Japan), only five transclusions. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's not redundant to {{Infobox road}}; it's used within {{Infobox road}}. I should note that it's used in only a few articles at the moment because we are sorely lacking on prefectural road articles right now, but that will change in the future. This template would be used in all of those. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Definitely not redundant to {{Infobox road}}, and in use. Unless there is some other template that makes it redundant, it should stay. --RL0919 (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IsDaylightEurope edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IsDaylightEurope (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, ParserFunction error. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - unused, and doesn't seem to actually work. Robofish (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Town GR edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Town GR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant of {{Infobox Greek Dimos}}, no transclusions in article namespace —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant. Markussep Talk 09:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Town DE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Town DE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant of {{Infobox German location}}, approximately two dozen transclusions in article namespace. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, former transclusions now use Infobox German location. Markussep Talk 15:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox sub-region edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and potentially redirect per {{Infobox region}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox sub-region (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only has five uses, apparently redundant of {{Infobox settlement}} although I could be mistaken. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It is not intended for incorporated place such as {{Infobox settlement}}. In the UK we use {{Infobox UK place}} for settlements and (somewhat confusingly) {{Infobox settlement}} for districts (which are our incorporated places). In the UK system there are a variety of sub-regions and statistical areas that exist between the two. This template is used for those. It may require expansion to other articles, and more fields (lots of data is produced for these areas), but it should not be deleted. MRSC (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - redundant to {{infobox settlement}}. No aspect of these five articles presents a need for a separate template. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete after replacing transclusions with {{Infobox settlement}}. Yes, {{Infobox UK place}} is redundant as well, but it has a long history and is used on thousands of articles, so replacing it would be a big deal. This one is relatively new and only used on a handful of articles. We should not encourage more redundant templates, especially when the established template has more functionality. --RL0919 (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; redundant. Does nothing that {{Infobox settlement}} cannot; and that template is intended to cover this purpose. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox School Pakistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox School Pakistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Few uses, possibly redundant of {{Infobox school}}. Note that template has a field for Local Education Authority and Ofsted... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete after replacing existing transclusions with {{Infobox school}}. There is no apparent need for versions of this infobox by country, and this one in particular doesn't seem to have any specific fields or terminology that might justify a localized version. --RL0919 (talk) 00:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Scottish Secondary School edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Scottish Secondary School (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, possibly redundant of {{Infobox school}} —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Unused, redundant to a widely used template, and seemingly abandoned, with no talk and no edits since Feb 2008. --RL0919 (talk) 00:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox School Algeria edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox School Algeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, possibly redundant of {{Infobox school}} —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Philippine region edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. RL0919 (talk) 00:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Philippine region (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Few uses, apparently redundant of {{Infobox settlement}} (please correct me if I'm wrong.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does provide quick reference, as there are 17 administrative regions in the Philippines, each composed of provinces, cities and municipalities, barangays. Philippine government data are mostly regionwide.--Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 03:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This template actually uses Infobox Settlement, so that it can be applied uniformly on the articles for Philippine regions. Infobox Settlement is extremely flexible, but so flexible that it can be used inconsistently on different articles, and this template intends to fix that. Other similar templates are {{Infobox Serbia municipality}}, {{Infobox Province Cambodia}}, and {{Infobox Region of Italy}}. TheCoffee (talk) 12:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn I was clearly ignorant. My apologies. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Lääni edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Lääni (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan, apparently redundant of {{Infobox settlement}} —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Ladies' GAA player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Ladies' GAA player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Hungarian county edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Hungarian county (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, redundant of {{Infobox settlement}} —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox high school in china edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox high school in china (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one use, redundant of {{Infobox school}} —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete after replacing existing transclusion with {{Infobox school}}. There is no apparent need for versions of this infobox by country, and this one in particular doesn't seem to have any specific fields or terminology that might justify a localized version. --RL0919 (talk) 16:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Dutch municipality/coords and maps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G8 as a sub-page of a deleted template that was overlooked when the parent was deleted. RL0919 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Dutch municipality/coords and maps (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Part of deleted template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox City Lebanon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete after replacing all transclusions with standard settlement template Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox City Lebanon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant of {{Infobox settlement}} (except includes ParserFunction errors). cf. Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_3#Template:Infobox_City_Taiwan, Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_3#Template:Infobox_City_Algeria, Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_3#Template:Infobox_City_NZ —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - As the original creator of this template in 2006, and a fan of using existing templates where possible, I'm okay with it being deleted. I'm just concerned about what will happen with the 120 or so articles that currently use it. Will some bot replace this template with Infobox settlement, or will all those articles be broken until someone manually changes them? ← George talk 01:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Cf. with Template:Mapit-US-cityscale. The template is "deleted" by vote, but not actually erased until it is manually taken out of articles. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Okay, sounds good. I support the template's deletion. ← George talk 01:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete after replacement of existing transclusions with {{Infobox settlement}}. One of the many redundant settlement templates that ought to be standardized. --RL0919 (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BAFL seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BAFL seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates three seasons out of about two dozen. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - that sounds like a reason to expand the template rather than deleting it. It has four links at the moment, which is probably just about enough to justify a navigational template, and if more are added it definitely will be. Robofish (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Arena Football League player (retired) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge with {{Infobox Arena Football League player}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Arena Football League player (retired) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unless there is something that I'm missing, this can be merged to {{Infobox Arena Football League player (active)}} and renamed {{Infobox Arena Football League player}}. If I'm just ignorant, please let me know. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hb cl team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hb cl team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, ParserFunction error. I'm not sure what the purpose is of this, so it might be worth retaining if someone can explain and fix it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb fm3 match edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb fm3 match (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, ParserFunction error. I'm not sure what the purpose is of this, so it might be worth retaining if someone can explain and fix it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb cm7 match edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 10:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb cm7 match (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, ParserFunction error. I'm not sure what the purpose is of this, so it might be worth retaining if someone can explain and fix it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb cm8 match edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 10:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb cm8 match (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, ParserFunction error. I'm not sure what the purpose is of this, so it might be worth retaining if someone can explain and fix it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Expiry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. I assume no one objects to me closing this in the circumstances despite my participation in the discussion, but if you do then feel free re-open for someone else to close. RL0919 (talk) 18:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Expiry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Virtually orphaned, expression error. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep unless there is a better reason for deletion. The expression error that appears on the template page itself does not seem to keep the template from functioning. (Sometimes expression errors appear on a template page because the expression is invalid without content that is only added in a full transclusion of the template.) It functions by making content hidden after a specific date/time has passed, and is currently in use on a few IP user talk pages to make block notices become invisible after the block expires. Doesn't appear to be widely used or advertised, but on first consideration it doesn't appear to be problematic. --RL0919 (talk) 00:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there are unset parameters. It's a template, it's not necessarily supposed to appear nice without being transcluded. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn Again, I was mistaken; this is a useful template. I'll take more care in the future. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb cm LUFC match edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb cm LUFC match (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, error template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location map/Marker edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep for now, but could/should be renominated if not put to some use in article space Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map/Marker (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, error-ridden —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This and the item immediately below are both subpages from an attempt to refactor {{Location map}} that was apparently not adopted due to problems with some browsers. See Template talk:Location map#New template version - do we want it?. --RL0919 (talk) 23:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    It wasn't adopted until the problems are figured out. Why in the world would that require deletion? Zocky | picture popups 16:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    It isn't required, but if there isn't any likelihood of the new version being adopted, why keep it around? Is there an active effort to fix the sandbox version from August so it might be adopted? --RL0919 (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    It's active in the "when I get around to it" way. Deleting it certainly doesn't help me ever get around to it. Zocky | picture popups 17:50, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Switch to keep, then. If you plan to work on it, I don't see a problem if it stays for now. If it is still lingering unedited many months from now, we can revisit. --RL0919 (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The page Template:Location map/Sandbox/doc explains its usage. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location map/Rectangle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep for now, but could/should be renominated if not put to some use in article space Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map/Rectangle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, error-ridden —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_23&oldid=1078571934"