Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Transylvanian peasant revolt

Transylvanian peasant revolt

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Borsoka (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Rgvis (talk · contribs)
3. Seraphim System (talk · contribs) (he/she has expressed several times that he/she is willing to participate in the discussion)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Transylvanian peasant revolt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Transylvanian peasant revolt#Orthodoxy
• Talk:Transylvanian peasant revolt#Neutrality
• Talk:Transylvanian peasant revolt#Neutrality II
• [1]
• [2]

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Rqvis says, "The article does not keep a balanced content regarding the historical facts presented; it is heavily based on the positions of authors affiliated to the Hungarian historiography, ignoring almost completely opinions of those affiliated to the Romanian historiography." ([3])

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Borsoka (talk) 04:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequsite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 04:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)