Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Held nominations
In this page, articles being considered for the current Release Version cycle are debated, if a member of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Review Team has a concern about the importance of a topic. Articles placed on this page are reviewed by a larger group of users, which then decide whether to include the article to the current release, to hold it for a future release cycle, or to fail it completely due to quality concerns (which entails a new nomination after improvements have been made). Nomination procedures edit
How to vote editThere are three sections under which you can place your signature (~~~~). There is the hold section, for articles that you believe do not merit inclusion in the current release version cycle due to importance concerns only. If you believe an article satisfies both quality and importance criteria, comment in the include section. If you believe an article has issues with quality only, please use the fail section. Ideally, these articles should not come to this page; members of the 1.0 review team are encouraged to fail the articles directly, to allow them to be fixed up for inclusion in the current release cycle. Don't forget to add a reason to why you commented the way you did, whether it be with your signature, or ideally, in the discussion section of each nomination. The discussion is the most important part of the review process. Current Nominations editMurder of Amanda Dowler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/1/0
The article is a good article. HELD - stats indicate that this case is not prominent enough. Walkerma (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Board game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/4 Stub ??. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I voted fail because of the two maitenance tags,the one on OR especially swayed my vote. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC) I think it's something that should be included on importance, but it is not up to standard in terms of quality. The tags were also a factor in my vote. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC) The article still has a maitenance tag. More citations are required. AdjustShift (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/4 Stub. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Church (building) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0 Start. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Civil liberties (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)} editNumber of votes: 1/0/4 Stub, Bias. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Percy Henn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0 Original nomination: Definitely deserves an inclusion. Almost GA. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
South Australian legislative election, 2006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0 Original nomination: The South Australian 2006 election which saw the Liberal Party of Australias worst election result in SA history. Is an FA article. Timeshift 12:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Voyage: Inspired by Jules Verne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 3/0/0 Original nomination: This article has recently been upgraded to A-class and is almost certainly going to be upgraded to FA-status. It is currently undergoing FAC and all comments have been addressed, as have those from the WikiProject CVG assessment, which gave it A-class. While some may say that it is not of the utmost importance, the number of really good adventure game articles is quite lacking, so having some good adventure game articles is probably a good move. Quality wise the article is excellent.--Paaerduag 13:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Fathers and Sons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/4/1
Kurt Vonnegut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) edit
Kansas Turnpike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 4/0/0 FA, but not sure if it is important or significant enough for a worldwide scope.
Visual Basic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Sherlock Holmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/3/1 I think this is a good article to add to version 0.7. Because of Sherlock Holmes novels are widely known in England.
I voted hold just because I wouldn't feel safe passing an article that barely has any inline citations. There's no way to tell if there's any original research included. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC) No in-line citations - a quality factor rather than importance. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Pauline Fowler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 0/0/0
Radha Ramana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Dharmacakra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Andrew Saul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Chen Chi-mai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Swaminarayan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Swaminarayan Sampraday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Swaminarayan temples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
William_Stacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
The Great American Bash (2005) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
December to Dismember (2006) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
SummerSlam (2003) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Chris Benoit double murder and suicide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Oxfordian theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Ash Wednesday fires (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Naulakha Pavilion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Sheesh Mahal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
William A. Spinks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
George Balabushka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Willie Mosconi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Rudolf Wanderone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Jean Balukas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Texas Tech Red Raiders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's road race (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 2/0/0
Bob Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) editNumber of votes: 1/0/0
Archives editClosed nominations go here. Archive 1 |