Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2019 June 26

Miscellaneous desk
< June 25 << May | June | Jul >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


June 26 edit

Unknown Plant edit

Is anyone able to identify this plant: [1] [2] [3] It is in the United Kingdom and I believe it is a flowering plant. Thanks, Willbb234 (talk) 17:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A weed perhaps? Anton 81.131.40.58 (talk) 13:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably one of the asteraceae - but that's not exactly tying it down very well. Mikenorton (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Anton - weeds are defined by where they grow - they are "a plant in the wrong place" per the very first sentence of the article you linked. So "weed" is both unhelpful and (unless this was taken in a garden or other situation where the flora is controlled) incorrect. Matt Deres (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Matt Deres please see humour Anton 81.131.40.58 (talk) 09:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My trusty Observer's Book of Plants suggests a similarity to shepherd's purse. Alansplodge (talk) 16:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Plants are not my specialty, but I'm not seeing the eponymous "purses". Are there varieties missing them? Matt Deres (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the purses are the seed pods which grow after flowering, but not my speciality. A clearer look at the leaves would help. Alansplodge (talk) 08:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not to worry, I will remove them if they are, in fact, a weed. But for now, I will just let them grow up and see what the are. Thanks, Willbb234 (talk) 20:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It might be helpful to take some more pictures when the flowers are more open. I agree with Mike, it does look like an Asteracaea, but as he said that doesn't tie it down much! They do look familiar to me, and I haven't been able to find them in any of my wild flower books, so I suspect some sort of cultivated variety. I think they're rather attractive. DuncanHill (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is possibly Filago vulgaris, commonly called Cudweed. I have a probability of 80%. Richard Avery (talk) 16:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]