Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2022 January 21

Mathematics desk
< January 20 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 22 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 21 edit

Where do 2/P in Fourier coefficients come from? edit

  Resolved

Equantions for Fourier coefficients are

  (1)
  (2)

I cannot figure out the equations above because of the occurrence of  . I guess   comes from the norm being used for normalizing basis functions   and  . Accroding to this, if I understand correctly, the inner product of   with itself is

  (3)

where  . Therefore

  (4)

The normalized basis functions are

  (5)

So the Fourier coefficients I get should be like the scalar projection of   onto orthonormal basis in (5)

  (6)

Unluckily, (6) is different from (1). Any idea? - Justin545 (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not defined symmetrically. So
 
Ruslik_Zero 20:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't get it. Could you provide further explanation? - Justin545 (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The basis for Fourier analysis of a periodic function is given by the following orthogonality properties of the sine and cosine functions. Let   and   be positive integers. Then
 
 
For the sake of simplicity, let us fix the period as  . Let function   be given by
 
Let us also assume the infinite summations converge. Now consider what happens if we multiply   by  ,  , and integrate over the period:
 
 
 
 
 
(For the last step, split the summation into the cases   and   and apply the orthogonality formulas.) So, to find the value of  , we need to divide to result of the integral by  , that is, half the period. For   we have the same story, except that we multiply   by    --Lambiam 07:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys, in particular Lambiam. The answer for   is understandable and crystal clear. I may try to figure out the term   of   and ask for help if I'm stuck again. - Justin545 (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For  , just integrate   without multiplier – which is equivalent to multiplying it by    --Lambiam 14:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]