Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2017 October 3
| Mathematics desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < October 2 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 4 > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
October 3 edit
Vertical bars in set theory edit
In this problem:
(2) Find a model 𝒥 for the following set of sentences, with |𝒥| = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}:
1. ∀x∃yRxy
2. 𝑓(x, 𝑠(x)) = sum(1, prod(x, 2))
What do the vertical bars around the second instance of 𝒥 mean? Is it saying that {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} is the set of sentences that 𝒥 is supposed to model?
MonroeL (talk) 04:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think it's probably using |𝒥| to mean the universe of the model (sometimes called the domain, the underlying set, or the carrier). That is, your "objects" are the numbers 1 through 5.
(Note that I don't think this is very standard notation. More usually, |𝒥| would be the cardinality of the universe.)I take it back — actually I think this is reasonably standard.- I don't think there's enough information here to give a sensible answer to the problem. Are we supposed to take "sum" and "product" to have their usual meanings on 1 through 5? That doesn't make a lot of sense, given that some of the answers would not be objects of the model. So I'm not quite sure what's going on. --Trovatore (talk) 04:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the speedy response!
- In this problem, the function s is the successor function, and sum and prod are the usual meanings for the terms "sum" and "product."
- I just saw this information from the instructor: "you need to find a relation over |𝒥| that makes 1. true, and a function over |𝒥| that makes 2. true." I don't think that's communicated very clearly in the original problem, but it's alright!
- I appreciate the help a lot. Have a great day! MonroeL (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's still very peculiar. For example, in the second clause, take x to be 3. Then you have 𝑓(x, 𝑠(x)) = 𝑓(3, 4) = sum(1, prod(3, 2)) = 7, if I'm following so far. But 7 is not an element of the universe of the model, so as far as I can tell this doesn't make sense. --Trovatore (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Side comment: possibly, if the question gets answered, the answer could be added to the List of mathematical symbols...? --CiaPan (talk) 06:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)