Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2014 July 30

Mathematics desk
< July 29 << Jun | July | Aug >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


July 30 edit

General Term edit

Let   Then the first few terms are:


a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10
1 9/2 21 225/2 1395/2 19845/4 40005 722925/2 7243425/2


I was not able to find this sequence at the OEIS, and I was wondering whether
someone might help me find a general formula or algorithm for generating it. —
86.125.202.236 (talk) 01:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hint:  . If you work through the sums you should end up with  . DTLHS (talk) 03:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Resolved
 – - Thank you! :-)
Interestingly, this sequence is intimately related to the enumeration of functions which map a discrete space to itself. RomanSpa (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spectrum Problem in FMT edit

So, mentioning 0-1 laws in an above question caused me to end up rereading [1] from Fagin, which made me get reinterested in spectrums. I noticed [2] from 2009, which is interesting. I was wondering if anyone had any other reading suggestions on the topic; or if any further significant progress has been made since that was published? --Also, it mentions that the twin primes (and a few other sets of primes) are spectrums, it mentions that this because each such set is rudimentary, and all rudimentary sets are spectra; however, I was curious if anyone was aware of what FO sentences they are spectra of? More generally, given a set S that is a spectrum, is it possible to work backwards and get a sentence it corresponds with - for example, finite fields give that prime powers are a spectrum, could we run this backwards knowing that prime powers are a spectrum? Thank you for any help:-) By the way, I notice that we have Spectrum of a theory, but this does not discuss the FMT notion of spectrum, nor anything relating to it - do we have a page that does, or is this something that is not yet covered by Wikipedia?Phoenixia1177 (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FMT = Finite model theory. -- ToE 15:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Some thoughts: I can't find anything specific to spectra in the sense of finite model theory described in your first link on WP, but perhaps I haven't looked hard enough. As you likely know, the word "spectrum" is semantically overloaded in math and physics, but there are usually some similarities. E.g. Spectrum_(functional_analysis) talks about the generalization of eigenvalues of bounded linear operators. I'm unfamiliar with model theory, but there might be some connections there... Edit: that is probably nonsense. My dim memories of Decomposition_of_spectrum_(functional_analysis)#Decomposing_the_spectrum and Essential_spectrum made them seem more similar to the FMT definition.
As for finding a sentence that 'generates' a certain spectrum, that sounds like an inverse problem, and those are notoriously ill posed. Like a good counter example, my hunch is that there is not a general purpose algorithm for constructing such sentences, it would seem to require a clever human familiar with the concepts. As for further reading, lacking any better suggestions, I would just skim through the works that cite the Fagin paper on Google scholar. So, no answers from me, but I thought the links might help. SemanticMantis (talk) 21:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]