Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Redirect Archives/February 2006

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Redirect Archives
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion/Redirect Archives/February 2006)

February 1

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:45, Feb. 7, 2006 The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Polish invasion of Czechoslovakia → Occupation of Czechoslovakia -- Inherently POV term almost never used in English (Google shows 6 hits) (6)Balcer 07:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong oppose. Another instance of Polish editors trying to whitewash embarrassing stains from their country's history and to cover up blatant aggression. If the redirect is deleted, I will restore it the next minute. --Ghirla | talk 09:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      If here will be consensus to delete it, you wouldn't have no right to restore it. - Darwinek 18:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete. per Balcer. Anti-Polish POV magnet. - Darwinek 11:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete. Especially that the matter could be pretty well explained in Border conflicts between Poland and Czechoslovakia. Halibutt 11:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. I'm wondering about the wisdom of deleting a redirect that represents a POV sentiment if that sentiment is discussed and dismissed as being POV in a target article. I've not read either Occupation of Czechoslovakia or Border conflicts between Poland and Czechoslovakia, but I'm wondering whether it would be better to have a POV redirect point at an article that places the POV sentiment in an NPOV context than to delete the redirect altogether. I'm looking at this from a general treatment perspective rather than taking into account the specifics of this particular context. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The situation here is much simpler: the expression "Polish invasion of Czechoslovakia" is practically never used in the English language in any context. Google shows 6 hits for the expression (see [1])(plus now the Wikipedia redirect as well). To my thinking, redirects do have to adhere to some minimal standard of use, otherwise we will have to allow millions of other redirects that users simply make up. Besides, if anything, it is the participation of the army of Communist Poland in the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia by the Warsaw Pact forces which would be brought to mind by this phrase, not the events of 1938. Balcer 00:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
These redirects were all deleted. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:49, Feb. 7, 2006 The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 2

edit

The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cecil County (MD) → Cecil County, Maryland -- This is a redirect from an unusual abbreviation that was used only once and is now unused; it is unlikely to be used again as the common abbreviation is "Cecil County, MD" .. inclusion of the parenthetical is idiosyncratic. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirects were deleted. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:52, Feb. 7, 2006
List of placenames over 20 letters long → Wikipedia:Unusual articles/Places with unusual names
List of places with interesting or unusual names → Wikipedia:Unusual articles/Places with unusual names -- A redirect from the encyclopedia namespace to the WP namespace. Original article was deleted at AfD, but later moved to userspace (and then WP:) after review. I have since removed many links to this article from the mainspace, per WP:ASR. Thanks/wangi 11:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 3

edit

The nominated redirect was kept, because of opposition to the nomination and the fact that {{rfd}} was not added to the redirect page. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was speedy deleted. —Cryptic (talk) 02:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 4

edit
The nominated redirect was kept -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • GMC_Sierra → Chevrolet_Silverado -- This page is supposed to be about The GMC Sierra. However, it redirects to a page about the Chevrolet Silverado. These trucks are related, but by no means the same truck. -Mtz1031
    • Oppose unless there is a plan to for someone to write an article about the GMC Sierra. When that happens, the redirect can go (and in fact will be replaced by the article). Until it happens, a redirect is fine. --Nlu (talk) 21:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose - These vehicles are virtually identical. --SFoskett 03:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
A new article was written at feederliner by Maury, thanks. -- Jitse Niesen
  • Feederliner → Regional_jet -- Feederliners are many types of aircraft, and are typically turboprops instead of jets Mexcellent 08:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Indeed, which is what the article was about when I wrote it a long time ago. It appears that someone has removed the content to some other article, and then turned this into an incorrect redirect. It should NOT be removed, at a minimum it should be pointed to the correct article, or re-instated. Maury 14:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmmm. I have done some poking about and I can't find anything like my original article at all. The regional jet article may had clipped large portions from it, but the turboprop section is missing. Likewise the regional airline article is about the the companies, not the aircraft. Yet there's nothing in the history of the feederliner article as to what has happened. It was about 5 pages long, I swear! Maury 14:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Looks like your feederliner article was merged with regional jets, which then gradually lost all references to turboprops. While some regional jets are feederliners, most feederliners are not regional jets. The worst part of it is there are quite a few articles on turboprop aircraft that mention they are feederliners, but going to feederliner takes you to regional jets, which is silly to say the least and causes the encyclopedia to contradict itself. The ideal solution would have been to not allow the articles to be merged, but that was two years ago, so whaddyagonnado. Delete the inaccurate redirect and move on, I hope. Mexcellent 17:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, it's worse than I thought. feederliner AND regional aircraft both redirect to regional jet, which makes no sense at all. If anything, the main article should be regional aircraft, and there should be redirects pointing to that article from feederliner and regional jet. The whole arrangement of feederliner/regional jet/regional aircraft has been slowly edited over a couple of years to the point where the relationships don't make sense anymore. I might fix it. Mexcellent 17:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hitoshi Igarishi → Hitoshi Igarashi -- Misspelling. Igarishi is not correct. Igarashi is correct. Mochi 17:58, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose because in my reading, I've seen this misspelling before, meaning it's quite likely some one could come here and search on that spelling. In that event, it would be good to have a redirect in place. adavidw 06:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 5

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted after merging the page histories. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aang Cibi → Aang -- This redirect to an animated character profile is practically useless, because it seems to have been born of a mistaken reading. The only occurance I've found of the phrase "Aang Cibi" (beyond pages that refer to wikipedia) is on a fanart site, where the artist has drawn a chibi of the character and mispelled the word itself. This has led to multiple people mistakenly claiming that the character has a surname. However, its page history may need to be merged. --Buinne 06:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 6

edit

The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The move was performed as requested because it is unlikely to meet opposition. For further reference, the proper place for requests like this is Wikipedia:Requested moves. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Jimmy Norton" → Jim Norton (comedian) -- The redirect has actual quotation marks in it, when near as I can tell, the person never spells their name like that, and nobody would be searching for a name enclosed in quotes like that. adavidw 06:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is a small possibility someone would type it in, and meanwhile it's not doing any harm. Oppose. ··gracefool |☺ 23:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nomination was withdrawn. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • List of Lists → List Of -- Recent creation. No history. Points to another (broken) redirect bd_ 17:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm rescinding my nomination; I've found an appropriate target. bd_ 17:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 7

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted. -GTBacchus(talk) 04:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted, after moving the history to Talk:Black metal/Faggoth. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Faggoth → Black metal -- The redirect is offensive, makes no sense, and might cause confusion. There's no history of black metal being termed "faggoth" to my knowledge. Jakob Huneycutt 16:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Faggoth was merged into Black metal, so has to be kept (in some form) for its history. See Talk:Faggoth and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faggoth. -- Eugene van der Pijll 17:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was turned into a disambiguation page, thanks. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Author! Author! → Performing Flea -- Author! Author! may be linked from certain wrong pages, such as Al Pacino, an actor whose title of this redirect is a 1982 film (which has not been created on Wikipedia). adnghiem501 05:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • (I've turned this into a disambig page, made stubs for the movie and the Asimov short and repointed the links to the right places - hope that's OK. JohnnyZen 10:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]
    • Thanks! adnghiem501 23:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 8

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted (and I also deleted Navy NCIS (television)). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • NCIS (television) → NCIS (TV series) -- All articles pointing to the redirect have been edited and corrected; in the absence of any articles pointing to the unused redirect it is highly unlikely that any user looking for the correct article would in fact tyle "NCIS (television)". — THOR =/\= 22:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Relisting because the {{rfd}} was not added. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • How about I add Navy NCIS (television) → NCIS (TV series) as well, as it is the page I'd placed the {{rfd}} on initially? How very embarrasing, my apologies. — THOR =/\= 02:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete. Although it's harmless, since (TV series) is the usual style for TV series articles it seems unlikely this will be linked to in the future). Peyna 23:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirects were all deleted, with thanks to FoN for fixing the copy-past move. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 9

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirects were all deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • HTML entity redirects: a variety of redirects have been created in recent weeks whose titles are HTML entity codes, as listed below in the subitems. These cannot be searched for or located in the usual way. For instance, to find "[[&lt;]]" you would have to type &amp;lt; in the search box. To link to it, you need to type [[&amp;lt;]] in the wikitext. Further, these titles will cause problems with bots and scripts that analyze redirects, because the scripts will convert the entity codes into the corresponding character. I propose a blanket rule that all such redirects be deleted, including those listed below. --Russ Blau (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, because it is a possible typo. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 11

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted. I don't know why KWH wants to keep the redirect, but since it is to the category namespace I decided to delete the redirect. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept (no consensus). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept (no consensus). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was nuked. — Feb. 19, '06 [05:02] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was speedied (see above). — Feb. 19, '06 [04:59] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • ((((っ´ω｀)っ → Emoticon -- Orphaned, not likely to ever get used, and bad naming convention xaosflux Talk/CVU 14:28, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete Unlikely. --LV (Dark Mark) 16:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete this and the other historyless redirects containing non-ASCII chars that point to Emoticon such as （ ●д●） and ┐('～`；)┌ (there are about a hundred of these). Kusma (討論) 19:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete this and the others Kusma describes. Jonathunder 22:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • KEEP harmless redirect. It may never be referenced in an article page, but it could certainly be searched for. (I don't expect emoticons to be linked from from an article page nayways.) All emoticons on the emoticon article page should have a redirect to the emoticon page. 132.205.45.110 18:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nomination is moot as the move requested by Lord Voldemort has already been performed. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. The proper solution is to either fix the links or make Nightside into a disambiguation page. Besides, {{rfd}} was not added correctly (after the #REDIRECT …, instead of in front). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nightside → Mark Elliot -- Might cause confusion. Mark Elliot hosts a show called The Nightside, but there's been a TV series and a Marvel comic by the name of "Nightside", both of which are showing up incorrectly as bluelinks because the incorrect name of this show is redirecting to the show's host. Antaeus Feldspar 07:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Turn into a disambiguation page. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 14:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 12

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted, after merging the page histories to satisfy GFDL requirements. According to , Renon is a place with 7000 inhabitants in South Tirol. We can sort it out when a page on this Renon is created; for the moment. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Renon (castlevania) → Renon -- The other page was created with the (castlevania) to clarify that the character was from the Castlevania video game series. The page was then moved to "Renon" as there was no such article. All links have been corrected. No one will be searching for "Renon (castlevania)" simply "Renon." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guermantes (talk • contribs) 20:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • EngineerIng → Engineering -- no links to "EngineerIng" BrownHairedGirl 15:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete; pointless redirect. A search for EngineerIng finds Engineering redirects as the top hits anyway. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 15:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - As noted below, lack of links is not a good reason for deletion of a redirect. Hairy Dude 03:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete. To be sure about this (and because a capital [Ii] and lowercase [Ll] render identically for me) I deleted this redirect for a few seconds, then entered EngineerIng in the search box, then restored it after testing. It goes directly to the Engineering article even without a redirect in place, because the search box is not case sensitive, wiki-links and urls are case-sensitive, however. — Feb. 18, '06 [20:12] <freakofnurxture|talk>
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted by User:Android per the Proposed Deletion process. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1.2 → Battlefield_2_patch_1.2 -- There are a million pieces of software which have a version 1.2, nothing special about this particular one. Xyzzyplugh 23:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete as too unspecific. I just created this by a page move, should have listed it myself. Kusma (討論) 03:04, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 13

edit
The nominated redirects were all deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 14

edit
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. Change it into a distinct article at a later date and include a disambuation link to the latter title. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Marian military reforms -- made by a french user, I talked with him. Apparently, this is used in the french language but in the english language it is virtually unknown. "Marian reforms" is the unversal english term. Flamarande 17:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep, does no harm, and you never know what people will link to. Angr/talk 22:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Barcid family -- I am the author, and latteron I moved the page to betternamed Barcid article. My reasons are that a user will use "Barcid" as a "searchword" and therefore render "Barcid family" completely useless. Flamarande 17:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep, does no harm, and you never know what people will link to. Angr/talk 22:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was speedy-deleted under G7. Angr/talk 22:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. Turn it into a separate page if we find out "Venedig" might also mean something else. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Venedig → Venice -- No reason at all why the German name of Venice should be a redirect to Venice. The Italian and Venetian names, yes, but why the German name? Angr/talk 09:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep, I know if I wanted to see the French page on (say) London, I might type in London first, rather than Londres. Maybe tag with {{R from alternate language}} though. Proto||type 15:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete, this is the english wikipedia, not the german one. If someone wants to use only his own language (or does not know the english translations/name) then he should go to his own language Wiki (in this particular case German/Wiki). If Wikipedia starts to use all translations of all the names then we are in a big trouble. Flamarande 17:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete, this is the reason for the "in other languages" links. de:Venedig already contains a link to Venice. -- Renesis13 18:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted, redundant. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 15

edit
The nominated redirect was deleted as non-useful, the article does not include the phrase "dragon bus". — Mar. 3, '06 [17:50] <freakofnurxture|talk>
The nominated redirect was deleted cross-namespace, makes no sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:50] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Wp:dmexpress → DMExpress -- improper redirect from wp pseudo-namespace (cf. Wikipedia:Namespace#Pseudo-namespaces). Alphax τεχ 14:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was deleted cross-namespace, makes no sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:50] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Template messages/Cleanup → User:Cmt.bennett@ntlworld.com/Endoscopic mucosal resection -- User apparently created this page in error; I moved it to his userpage and the remaining redirect should probably now be deleted. Peyna 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]


    • February 16

    edit
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless, evidently a plausible misspelling. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was de1eted, imp1ausib1e typo. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Sagemont Lower School1 → Sagemont School -- There is already a redirect at Sagemont Lower School. Chances are that users are not going to randomly add a 1 onto the end of it. Also, page history is not important. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 00:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was speedied as an obvious mistake. — Feb. 19, '06 [04:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • [Day] → Boxing Day -- Obviously not a helpful redirect. --Russ Blau (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, obviously created in error due to a full stop inside the brackets. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Delete Page is not needed Anonym1ty 23:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    The nominated redirect was deleted, obviously created in error due to quotation marks inside the brackets. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were kept, apparently contain useful history and their existence leaves two less titles available for use as POV forks. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Arguments for the existence of God → Existence of God -- I've nominated this and the following redirect because a disagreement had broken out over them; one editor had tried to recreate an artcle, another had marked the redirects for speedy deletion, another had removed the speedy tag. At the moment I'm staying neutral, but the criteria for speedy deletion aren't met, so far as I can see. Both were turned into redirects after merging articles as the result of long discussions on their Talk pages. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Arguments against the existence of God → Existence of God -- I've nominated this and the preceding redirect because a disagreement had broken out over them; one editor had tried to recreate an artcle, another had marked the redirects for speedy deletion, another had removed the speedy tag. At the moment I'm staying neutral, but the criteria for speedy deletion aren't met, so far as I can see. Both were turned into redirects after merging articles as the result of long discussions on their Talk pages. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment: I removed the tags because I assumed the page history was needed following the previous merger(s) as per GFDL. If that's a problem, why not just protect the redirects? -- JJay 09:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment I agree with JJay. I looked at the "Arguments for" page and found a detailed history of a merger in July 2005 and all the content is duplicated in "Existence of God." It seems like the "for" and "against" pages should be made into redirects and then protected so they can't be reverted. Thatcher131 12:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oppose, the history needs saved. Protection probably isn't necessary, but wouldn't be harmful in this case. Peyna 00:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment. It is not necessary to keep the redirects, it is only necessary to preserve the history. That may also be achieved by moving the redirects out of the main namespace, for instance to Talk:Existence of God/Arguments for the existence of God. However, there seems to be no reason to delete the redirects. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]

    February 17

    edit
    The nominated redirect was kept as redirect to the disambiguation page, as harmless, and likely useful for links contained in old page revisions. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:03] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Novomoskovsk_(city) → Novomoskovsk,_Russia -- Novomoskovsk,_Ukraine page has been created, so it's now nontrivial whether the redirect should target the Russian or the Ukrainian city. Disambiguous page is not needed as both cities are already listed on the root disambiguous page Novomoskovsk Uapatriot 05:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment, I redirected it to the dab Novomoskovsk. Unlikely search candidate but seems hamrless and non-controversial. I suggest to keep it that way, but if anyone objects, we can restore the RfD template there. With however little chance of being useful, the redirect Novomoskovsk (city) to Novomoskovsk dab article has zero chanse to be harmful in any way. Feel free to revert me. --Irpen 05:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Keep -- A plausible fix. No harm, no foul. John Reid 04:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • either way is fine with me. --Irpen 09:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 18

    edit
    The nominated redirect was deleted, apparently nobody cares about it, as this has gone unnoticed for two weeks. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirects were deleted with a few exceptions. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • The following emoticon redirects: (*´д｀)(　ﾟ∀ﾟ)彡（；･∀･）（　｀ー´）（　＾∀＾）（｀Д´　）( 、 Ａ ,）（Д｀；　）（　゜∀。）(ﾟДﾟ,, )（☞ 。∀゜）☞（　 ・∀）(｀Д´)(；・∀･)（・∀・　）（・ω・｀ ）（　 ・Ａ・）(･ω･`*)(ﾟДﾟ*,,)（,, ・∀・）(*ﾟワﾟ)(｀･m･´)（ ´ⅴ｀）(´Д｀;)（;´Д｀）(*ﾟ∀ﾟ)(　`Д´)~(^-^~)(~^-^)~( ﾟ Д ﾟ)( ´･ω･)(ﾟДﾟ*)(ﾟДﾟ；)彡∩ﾟДﾟ）(@Д@)(@Д@；)( ﾟ～ﾟ )(*・∀・)(；；ﾟдﾟ)(,,'A`)(・ω・｀ )（ ´・ω・）（　´－｀）（,,｀・ω・）(｀Д´　）(　｡Д｡)(　｡A｡ )ヾ(ﾟ∀。)ﾉｼ（,,,,´・ω・）（；・∀・）(`･ω･´)(´･ω･｀)（´･ω・`） ヽ(`･ω･)ﾉ[[(^.^)/~~~]](*・ω・*)ヾ(･ ω･)ゞ(・(ェ)・；)(*´∀｀*)M0っ(`Д´)(ε･ω･)з(´ﾟЗﾟ｀)((((っ ´ω｀)っヽ(ﾟ∀ﾟ)ﾉ(@∀@-)( ゜э゜)（'A`）(ﾟДﾟ,）(*ﾟーﾟ)（=ﾟωﾟ）(ﾟωﾟ= ）ヽ(・ｅ・ )ﾉヽ(o・-・)ﾉ(ﾟдﾟ,,)(,,ﾟдﾟ)(=ﾟーﾟ)(=^ー^)('A` )('v` )M9（^Д^）(*‘ω‘ *)(￣ー￣)( * ‘ω‘)(( * ‘ω‘)ミ ﾟдﾟ 彡ヽ('A`)ﾉ(*'A`)('A`*)( 'A`)('A`)9mヽ(ﾟ∀ﾟ)ﾉｼ('Ａ`,,)(zAz)(A｀* )(o'ω`o)(`A')（・⊆・ 　）(*　・ )(§ﾟωﾟ)（*´з｀）(；`・ω・）(； ´ﾟωﾟ）( `・ω・）（・ω・´ ）（　’⑪’）（’⑪’　）（　・ω・）(・ω・ 　）（ ○｡｡○）(；　ﾟωﾟ）(,,・∀・)ミ,,・∀・ミ(;;・∀・)(,,；Д；)ﾐ,,；Д；ﾐ(;;；Д；)（*－－）( ´ー`)（・~。・　）( ´～`)( ﾟДﾟ)y━~~(;´Д`)(ﾟ ´Д｀ﾟ )(*^ー^)（. ;´∀｀）（゜Д゜ 　）（｡｡*）(;`･ω･)（・Д・*）（・Д・* ）( ﾟ∀ﾟ)(ﾟ∀ﾟ；)(･ｅ･)（lll´｡．。)（*｡・(･)・)（*・(･)・)（*´・(･)・）(・(･)・｀*)（*・(･)・*) Σ゜lllllＥ(ﾟ- 三ﾟ -ﾟ)(･◎･)（*■㎜■）(*ѿ*)(´・ω・)-/-\O)(^ ^)(~ ~)(- -)(= =)(｢･ω･)｢(｢･Д･)｢(｢･ω･`)｢(｢･∀･)｢从oﾟワﾟ)(｢^ω^)｢ ('Ａ`,;)(`д')(`A')9m(;,'Ａ`)(*；'A`)Σ)ﾟДﾟ)（　゜ ∀゜）（　 ｀ハ´）（´Д｀；　））`Д´（（ ・∀・）（・∀・）（・∀・　)¯\(º o)/¯\(º▽゜)-┌(☼◦☼)┐Β^)B^)(;´∀`)＼（´ｰ｀）ノ≡∆ ∆≡^.^ヽ(｀Д´)ﾉ( ´3`)～♪(・∀・)(ﾟ∀ﾟ)(´ー｀)（ ﾟ∀ﾟ ）（；´Д｀）( ﾟ Д ﾟ )（　Φ Φ）(　｡Д｡ )（ ´・ω・),' 3（　 ´Д｀）（-＿-）(；｀・ω・）（　´∀｀）（＾ω＾；）（　＾ω＾）（,,*´Д｀） （*´Д｀）(,,ﾟДﾟ)(　・Å・)（´Д｀ ）（´Д｀； ）（ﾟДﾟ ）（´Д｀* ）（´Д｀ ;）（*´∀｀*　）（‐∀‐ ,）（　*ﾟ∀ﾟ）（｀Д´）（,,・∀・）(｀･ω･´)（； ´Д｀）('-')（　゜д゜）( ´∀｀)(　 ･ω・)((　・ω)(ω・　))(`･ω･)( ;ﾟ∀ﾟ)(　＾▽＾)( ´ー｀)ミ ﾟДﾟ 彡( *ﾟ∀ﾟ)（　｡ ｡）('A`)（　^∀^ ）（ ;ﾟДﾟ)( ´∀`)（ﾟ∀ﾟ)（ ｀Д´ ）凸(*ﾟ０ﾟ)(ﾉﾟ∀ﾟ)ﾉ（　・∀・）（´∀｀　）（´Д｀　）（　´ ゝ`）(*´∀｀）(* ﾟДﾟ)（ ´Д｀ ）(ﾟдﾟ)(・ω・)(　ﾟдﾟ)(ﾟーﾟ*)(ﾟ0 ﾟ*)（ ●д●）M( )m(`ヘ´)（´・ω・｀）（ ´Д｀）（　ﾟДﾟ）┐('～`；)┌（´∀｀）Σ(゜д゜;)(*´Д`)＇へ＇凸╮ (─▽─)╭（　´Д｀）(　ﾟ∀ﾟ)XPBDXD=)^^;;;P[[/o\]];)=P=/(ﾟДﾟ;)(　´ⅴ｀)ノヽ(´-`)ノ（＊｀Д´）ノヽ(≧д≦)ノ（；￢＿￢）（ー”ー；）（●＾o＾●）ｖヽ(　￣д￣;)ノ(´^ิω^ิ｀)8D¬¬

    • Redirects may be cheap but this is just vandalism. If you need a reason, how about pollution of the namespace, neologism/OR (many of these are unique).  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  16:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • I agree completely. I have speedied most of these as patent nonsense, including those which made no sense, did not resemble a face, started and ended with parentheses, or contained untypable characters, but kept some that still seemed ridiculous, but which I have actually witnessed being used on IRC. This leaves us with ^.^, =), ;P, [[/o\]], ;), =P, =/, ¬¬. Note that XP, BD, XD, and 8D are actually disambiguation pages. — Feb. 18, '06 [19:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Furthermore, I have also speedied [[/o\]] because of the formating issues in linking to it (you must enter [[<nowiki>/o\</nowiki>]] to avoid being taken to a subpage of the one you are on). — Feb. 18, '06 [20:00] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Comment. Not all of them are redirects; for instance, XP is not. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah no prob with that. I kind of did a "batch" add there and I didn't really want to judge the 5 out of 300 that I thought might not be so easily removed.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  00:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • comment if the emoticon appears on the page, I don't see why a redirect doesn't exist for it. And why are emoticons that don't use parentheses "special"? As for non-typable characters, did you notice how many pages use non-ascii titles? Like 2003 UB313, which drops the 313, or stuff with accents, or archaic english letters like Æ ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by who knows? (talk • contribs)
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    This discussion is moot because Kawaii (disambiguation) was not a redirect to start with and has now be deleted by User:Commander Keane because disamb pages with two entries are not needed. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Kawaii (disambiguation) → Kawaii -- This disambig is no longer needed as the only other entry is properly linked at kawaii, which is currently up for deletion itself. There are no pages linking to the disambig.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  15:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not a redirect page. and the disambiguation is needed. The person above tried to get Kawaii deleted and failed and now truing to get the (disambiguation) page deleted. --Cool CatTalk|@ 19:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, not useful. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were speedy-deleted under CSD G3 (redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were deleted, usefulness not apparent. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Hac-er → Hyles-Anderson College. Hac-er googles many hits, and Hyles-Anderson does not appear prominent among them. It's apparently a minor local slang of some sort. Highly unlikely search term, orphan. Guy 23:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hacer → Hyles-Anderson College. Pretty much as above. Also an orphan. Guy 23:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were kept, harmless, and could very easily prevent duplicate articles by clueless newbies. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 19

    edit
    The nominated redirect was kept, might aid accidental linking and prevent a duplicate article from being created by mistake. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, not offensive, and does make sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept as redirect to List of billionaires. Bill Gates could lose his assets, you never know. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted as a broken redirect. — Feb. 21, '06 [00:00] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, looks plausible to me. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, malformed disambiguator. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted appears to be created in error. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, currently mentioned in first paragraph of the article. If this is not inappropriate, it should be discussed at Talk:Democrat In Name Only, and the presence or absence of a redirect should be match that editorial decision. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, seems to be the wrong frequency. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • I'm guessing this is a mistake. WSTR (FM) in Atlanta is on 94.1, but it's known just as "Star 94", not as "Star 94.1". However, there appear to be at least three other stations in the U.S. known as "Star 94.1", so I'm going to vote to recreate as disambig page. --Aaron 00:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 20

    edit
    The nominated redirect was kept, useful search term, most likely a high-traffic redirect for anybody unfamiliar with NPOV/political correct article nomenclature of Wikipedia. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Keep unless we are going to have a list of verified cults. The list makes clear what it is, and that's probably what the user wanted in the first place. Just zis Guy you know? 11:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep. For same reason as User:JzG. -Will Beback 21:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • keep because people will search on "list of cults". I understand that this may not be very fair to the groups listed, but it is very informative. Andries 22:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless, nearly synonymous, and might prevent the creation of a duplicate list. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was redirect List of new religious movements instead (more likely to be the intended link target). — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no objections, doesn't seem useful either. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • WRWB (WB 100+) → WRWB-TV -- WRWB in Rochester may be a cable-only WB affiliate, but it is not WB 100+. Unlikely search term. I actually started at that title and then moved it to WRWB-TV to make it easier to relocate it, but is not actually needed. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, no consensus, seems harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted as unlikely search term, and a bit self-aggrandizing as well. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Freakofnurture. -- JLaTondre 23:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 21

    edit
    The nominated redirect was deleted as inaccurate, should probably be a distinct topic, but I'm no chemist. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Neobutane → 2,2-dimethylbutane -- "Neobutane" is not actually the name of any compound; what the author was describing is neohexane. The article has been moved to the correct systematic name. Choess 22:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, implausible search term. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no objection. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept per [2], seems to be an alternate transliteration and seems harmless. If this refers to a distinct (notable) person, please replace the redirect with an article at some point. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:07] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Gallicinus → Callinicus -- Orphan redirect result of human error not misspelling; There was most probably in fact some Gallicinus who was not the same as the linked Callinicus (see talk page). However the author indeed meant Callinicus and probably just messed up his name.Contributor175 18:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • This is probably more complicated than it originally seemed. Please then do keep until further notice. User:Srnec provided some relevant information in my talk page. Contributor175 18:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, not contextually useful. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Sound (computer) → Sound -- Tagged on 20 Oct, but apparently not listed here. I have to agree with original tagger as sound does not discuss computer sound. Didn't see a suitable replacement redirect as computer sound appears to be broken up into it's components (Computer speaker, PC speaker, etc.). -- JLaTondre 03:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, very plausible. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no longer mentioned in the latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no longer mentioned in the latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Well, if I removed the actual articles, as this "edit" claims I did, then I can't see my way clear to any objections. --maru (talk) contribs 20:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, phrase not mentioned in latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 23

    edit
    The nominated redirect was deleted, implausible. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted as verbose PC-title creep. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedy Deleted by UkPaolo. -- JLaTondre 23:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, implausible, probably created in error. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted and protected, because DRV says so. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Delete and protect. An in-progress deletion review on Judeofascism is currently showing overwhelming consensus to keep deleted and protected. --Aaron 17:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete and protect POV proto-logism begone --Doc ask? 17:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete and protect per all above gidonb 02:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete and protect for the same reasons Judeofascism is also in the "Delete and protect" status. IZAK 10:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 24

    edit
    The nominated redirect was deleted, makes no sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted not likely. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, cross-namespace. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, unlikely. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, most likely an error. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, most likely an error. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was redirected, Godwin's Law, great idea. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 25

    edit
    The nominated redirect was deleted, unlikely. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:37] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedy deleted (R2) by Punkmorten. -- JLaTondre 04:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedy deleted (R1) by Cryptic. -- JLaTondre 04:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:37] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Keep Kind of strange to list it here. AFAIK, it doesn't fall into any criteria for RfD --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 06:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, poorly formed, probably a mistake. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:37] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. This redirect is confusing because Raszyn and Radzymin seem to be different places in Poland. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 26

    edit
    The nominated redirect was keep, prominent figure in latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Keep. See next for rationale. -- JLaTondre 14:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was keep, prominent figure in latter article. Possibly create a disambiguation page later, as I doubt the other fellows are more notable than JonBenét's dad. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • John Ramsey → JonBenét Ramsey -- A very few non-notable persons are named John Ramsey, and John Ramsey which is redirect to JonBenét Ramsey is the father of her that does not necessarily need to be created for an article. adnghiem501 08:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep. Your rationale for deletion is exactly why they should be kept. They don't need their own articles so a redirect to where they are actually discussed is appropriate. That's one of the purposes of redirects. -- JLaTondre 14:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment:It would be wrong. Two non-notable persons with the same name, listed at Wikipedia:Find-A-Grave famous people/R are not about JonBenét Ramsey's father, and they could be redirect to a wrong article. Their articles have never been created before. It's better to put the redirect up for deletion. Please check "What links here". adnghiem501 06:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I've deleted the blue links of those non-notable John Ramsey at Wikipedia:Find-A-Grave famous people/R. I'm so sorry; I must be confused with my thought, once in a while. The target should be kept. adnghiem501 07:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was delete, Dr. Bender is not mentioned in latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Delete per related AfD conversation. --ZsinjTalk 03:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: This might qualify for an R1 speedy delete. --Aaron 17:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted by somebody else already. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was nuked on sight, and so was the article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 27

    edit
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by grm_wnr as CSD R1. -- JLaTondre 20:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, per Kusma. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • John Gerrard has been redirected to John Gerard S.J.... the original page needs deleting --Timsj 13:32, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • This appears to have been a merge, not a move, so the original page needs to stay for the page history or be history-merged. If "John Gerrard" isn't used for anything else, it seems like a sufficiently likely misspelling to keep this as a redirect. Kusma (討論) 01:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were all deleted, some speedily by Xaosflux and the rest by me. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Roderick Davis → Roderick Smith -- A disambiguation page for "Roderick Smith" was created at "Roderick Davis". The article has been moved to Roderick Smith and it makes no sense whatsoever to retain the redirect from Roderick Davis. Nothing links to this article. —Wrathchild (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Freakofnurture. -- JLaTondre 02:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 28

    edit
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete per nom. --– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 07:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Redirect_Archives/February_2006&oldid=1089797277"