Wikipedia:Peer review/Woman's Home Companion/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because…I've recently made some substantial edits to an existing article.

Thanks, Jaldous1 (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Tintor2 (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaldous1. The article could become a GA but there are somethings that bothered me.

The lead feels like a spam of wikilinks. Try avoid by writing "It had multiple famous editors"
Again with the lead. I would suggest expanding considering how big is the body of the article.
There are several sentences unsourced. I tagged some for you to see.
"Stats and lists about the magazine" feels quite empty. If you can't reference such large section, I would suggest removing it.

Other than I'm also making a peer review in Wikipedia:Peer review/Allen Walker/archive1. I would appreciate responses.