Wikipedia:Peer review/University of Essex/archive1

University of Essex edit

I've updated and added a lot of information to this article recently, including adding a very detailed section on the foundation of the University, all fact-checked with the University itself. I'd appreciate feedback back on any of the article's sections, particularly sections that could be added to create more depth to the article. Joondan 11:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).
  • Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.
  • Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.
  • Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.
    • To assist you with this, add {{subst:js|User:AndyZ/monobook.js/footnotehelper.js}} to your monobook.js file (mine is located at User:AndyZ/monobook.js) and then bypass your browser's cache by pressing: Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), Internet Explorer: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5. In editing mode, click on the "Footnote creater" tab that appears.
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • It can be improved by reducing links to solitary years. A monobook tool allows this to be done with one click on a 'dates' tab in edit mode. You can then accept or reject the changes offered and/or do more editing before pressing 'Save'. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. Hope that helps. bobblewik 19:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  • British English is correct for this page - you don't need to follow the first contributor rule in this case (so I've changed center to centre,color to colour etc). It also needs a decision to be made on when University is has caps, as it is sometime refered to as "The University" and sometimes "the university". My suggestion would be lowercase unless it is being given its full title: "the University of Essex".
  • For ideas, I'd have a look at University of Oklahoma (currently being peer-reviewed) and Cornell University (featured article)
  • Most sections are too short (one paraggraph)
  • Could use more varied citations. Inline citations are greatly appreciated too, nowadays.
  • Higher quality logo would improve the lead's aspect. Circeus 02:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced logo with better one EuroSong talk 00:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]