Wikipedia:Peer review/Tupou VI/archive1

Tupou VI edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make this article better before the GA review happens.

Thanks, History6042 (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Davest3r08 edit

Royal Central is unreliable per WP:RSP, citations to it on the article should be replaced with more reliable sources.
Try running InternetArchiveBot on the article.
Per MOS:LEADCITE, citations should not be in the lead as it summarizes the article.

Davest3r08 >:) ^(talk) 16:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Davest3r08. History6042 (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the citation to Royal Central and took the citations out of the lead. Using InternetArchiveBot did nothing. History6042 (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History6042, Royal Central is still cited in the article, could you replace it with a more reliable source? — Davest3r08 >:) ^(talk) 20:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also recommend that you expand the article, as most of its sections are one paragraph long, a violation of MOS:OVERSECTION. — Davest3r08 >:) ^(talk) 20:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is it still cited? History6042 (talk) 21:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History6042, nevermind, that was a mistake of mine. — Davest3r08 >:) ^(talk) 00:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK History6042 (talk) 01:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]