The Game (mind game) edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I spent roughly 2 hours making this edit to the article and I think it's as good as I can get it. Some sections may be a little too detailed or contain stuff that doesn't need a mention - I'd like a second opinion as to whether everything mentioned is relevant and notable. Following two quickly-failed good article nominations a few years ago, I'm trying to get this to GA status.
Thanks, Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 10:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments by Forbidden User edit
- This article needs expansion - even the shortest GA is more than one-third longer.
- Define "long" - the second recently listed GAs I looked at, Volvopluteus michiganensis, is just 18 characters longer than The Game and is only 10,000 bytes. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- The "strategies" part should be expanded in particular.
- Expanded - take a look Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- "Reception" is another part that should be expanded.
- Started to expand - probably could add a bit more Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Overall: As it is not very notable, chances of making this GA is rather low. However, if you can do the expansion (and don't forget to request copyediting from WP:GOCE), you may actually work this out.Forbidden User (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- I thought WP:GOCE is only for articles that have serious prose issues and need cleaning up. I didn't think it would apply to articles like this with (I would hope) reasonably good prose. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)