Wikipedia:Peer review/Tangled/archive1

Tangled edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to push this article to GA status, and afterwards FA.

Thanks, Forbidden User (talk) 16:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, are you up for reviewing my nomination in trade for me reviewing yours? My nomination is going to FA this week, so I need feedback fast. The article is Super Mario Bros. 3 and the page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Super_Mario_Bros._3/archive2. Thanks for everything! URDNEXT (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it seems someone has been reviewing at the time I look at that page. Could you still review this page? Thanks!Forbidden User (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
People can review pages at the same time with no problem, just look at FA nomiations. And yes, I will review this page too. URDNEXT (talk) 12:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! I will be on your PR, though from 2 to 6 July I'll be on a trip.Forbidden User (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks! And I just started reviewing your oage, by the way. URDNEXT (talk) 15:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
URDNEXT, hello? By the way, other editors are welcome as well.Forbidden User (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The origins and conceptions section, and character develpment is too short. I recommend each being at least 4 paragraphs, and I'm sure there's more info to be covered there.
  • Release is missing a lot of info and needs expandion.
  • Reception needs a revamp. Try dedicating 2 to 3 sentences to a certain aspect of the film and how it was received by critics, like: The soundtrack was well received by critics... or, the acting was praised by critics... Then you just add a couple of supporting sentences for this.
  • Tangled ever after needs expansion.
I'll be back for more soon. URDNEXT (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tangled Ever After is a 6-7 min short, and so I have almost nothing to put on that. Others are being taken care of, thanks!Forbidden User (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]