Wikipedia:Peer review/Sugar & Spice (Picket Fences)/archive1
Sugar & Spice (Picket Fences episode) edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because although it's brand-new and on the short side, I believe it fulfills or comes close to meeting the good article criteria. Since I'm the only one who's worked on the article, I wanted to get some new eyes on it before nominating it. Comments in the context of the GA criteria would be most helpful. Otto4711 (talk) 22:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Interesting article, seems pretty good for what is there. Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement.
- I would label the lead image caption to make it clear why the image is so dark.
- I am not sure "dramedy" is a word most readers will know - you could link comedy-dramedy to comedy-drama perhaps.
- Looking at some model FA articles on tv episodes, I see they usually have a production section and a reception section - I think the current controvery section could be split and most of the controversy could be in a reception section.
- Is there more info on reception at the time - what did TV critics then write about the episode? Or what kind of social commentary was there (if any) about the article?
- Has the episode been released on DVD? IS there DVD commentary or special features available that would be pertinent?
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)