| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because... I want to list this article at FAC, for that the article needs a revision at the hands of experts and possible expansion if needed. I‘ve worked hard on it but still it requires cleanup from an expert.
Thanks, MehrajMir ' (Talk) 06:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. The article does not seem comprehensive. There are needed details left out. For example, one would like to know more about the settlements (villages and towns) in the valley. Information on flora and fauna need to be more ( no information on flora is present as of now). Climate (or, the variations in climate in different parts of the valley) could be added. It seems the valley is economically productive. Some more details (such as the names of the hydroelectric projects) would be welcome. A section on culture of the region would be good. After all these are done, a good lead with summery of the article will be needed. As of now, the article looks premature to aspire to be a featured article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- I echo these sentiments. The article is substantially underdeveloped. It needs a lot of work before it's near ready for FA, let alone GA. I would consider closing this review, spending time expanding and improving all aspects of the article and then nominating it for GA. At that point, I'd bring it back to PR for a review before submitting it for consideration as an FA. It needs a lot of attention. The history section needs an expansion, as do the lead, Geology and Ecology sections. I'd suggest looking at Chew Valley and other geography FAs and using them as a model to expand this one.--Batard0 (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)