Wikipedia:Peer review/Rubidium azide/archive1

Rubidium azide edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make sure that this article is as good as possible, and because I would like someone other than me to make sure of that.

Thanks, WhittleMario (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 22:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks WhittleMario for your hard work in not only creating but also putting in a lot of edits on this page!

The paragraph lifted straight from the research paper doesn't add much and is confusing to the average reader. It would be better if it were summarized in the traditional WP style.
The word 'azide' is used throughout the page, it would help if there was a description of azide in the intro, alongside the existing link to the azide page.
If possible, more sources should be found to try to beef up the article.
The description of the structure change and the Structure section in general may be too technical for most readers, try to keep the same information but make sure that it is accessible.
If possible, a picture of the chemical would be a good addition (make sure to follow WP:Image Use Policy). A representation of its atomic structure would also be a good visual.