Wikipedia:Peer review/Rigel/archive1

Rigel edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because many editors were editing it and after some protracted disagreements exhaustion set in. It is pretty comprehensive but (maybe) suffers from two many hands attempting to copyedit it. Some fresh eyes to read it and give some thoughts would be much appreciated.

Thanks, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]