Wikipedia:Peer review/Princess Peach/archive1

Princess Peach edit

Planning on elevating to featured article status, so I need some advice on what to add, delete or change. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:54, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think that putting up 17 articles at once will generate good peer review on each of them? Especially with multiple articles on similar subject matter, there is a limited number of interested reviewers, and this is overwhelming! I would suggest picking two or three (at most) that are closest to being ready for an FAC nomination, and removing the others. The Peer Review system (and FAC, for that matter) is not robust enough to handle such heavy volume of this nature. - Bantman 00:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No rule saying that you cannot add even 100 articles to the Peer Review. But, anyhow, the faster it's Peer Reviewed, the faster it's gone, right? - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

True, but you are expected to incorporate suggestions at a reasonable rate and inactive requests are archived. I don't think you can give all reviews the attention they deserve if you've got this much requests going at the same time. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest adding a few external links/references... — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 01:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Ilyanep on the external links. Seems a bit short, especially in some very short sections. Ral 315 03:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is, what do I link to in the first place? - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]