Wikipedia:Peer review/Personnel selection/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is to be amended for the sake of a [course] in Industrial and organizational psychology as a part of the APS Wikipedia Initiative. Final edits are to come immediately.

Thanks, Yoyobyebye44 (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Lead is a little brief, I would hope to see at least two short paragraphs. Check out WP:LEAD.
You need to fix the disambiguation link.
", etc.)" try to avoid this a little. This is supposed to be encyclopaedic, not a guideline or pamphlet for employers.
"choosing the person who will be the most successful and make the most valuable contributions to the organisation" in general, yes, but of course personnel selection can involve nepotism which should be addressed, and even the idea you encourage people to be promoted to move them out of an organisation.
You abbreviate BFOQ but never use it so there's not point in the abbreviation.
Why are BFOQs in italics?
"members of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). Primary research" avoid these inline links. Make them proper references.
Expand the "predicting job performance" section as recommended by the big maintenance tag.
"Team Composition" -> "Team composition"
En-dashes for page ranges needed (per WP:DASH).
Three references is pretty weak, I'd expect to see many more.

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]