Wikipedia:Peer review/No Love Deep Web/archive1

No Love Deep Web edit

I've listed this article for peer review because I noticed that the quality of Death Grips articles is usually somewhat lacking, even including their discography page which was promoted to a featured list but later got deformed after Year of the Snitch was released. I'd like some suggestions on how to improve this page as it appears to be salvageable. Getting it to a B-class or higher would be great.

Thanks, Miklogfeather (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Miklogfeather: I just checked the article and I did minor fixes. Would you review Basshunter in return? List of issues of found:

  • Why is "online media groups" linked to online magazine?
  • Reference number 4 - Pitchfork should be linked. Same with the other references and websites.
  • "A sticker was included in the physical release of The Money Store that read: "No Love. Fall 2012." on the reverse side." - no reference.
  • "The song "Artificial Death in the West" features an audio sample from the song "Being Sucked in Again" by English post-punk band Wire from their 1978 album Chairs Missing." - no reference
  • "as well as being made available on iTunes and Spotify." - just write "as well as being made available digitally? There is no reference for iTunes anyway and there is no websie parameter for refernce number 24.
  • "No Love Deep Web was met with controversy related to its album cover, which depicts the image of an erect penis with the album title written across it." - from the lead we know it was pensis of Zach Hill. Why it's not mentioned in "Artwork and controversy"?
  • "Due to the explicit album artwork, Death Grips were forced[by whom?]" - template
  • "The 2013 Harvest release features the original artwork packaged in a black slipcase with a disclaimer stating that the artwork is explicit. The slipcase has to be removed before the album cover is shown.[citation needed]" - no reference.
  • There are only 3 reviews mentioned in "Reception" but there is a lot of them in table with revews. This section should be expanded.
  • No reference to tracklist.
  • No credits for tracklist available?
  • No personnel section?
  • "Pitchfork Media" - website of online music magazine is named just "Pitchfork".
  • Links to redirects.

Eurohunter (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In response to
  • No reference to tracklist.
  • No credits for tracklist available?
  • No personnel section?
WP:TRACKLIST says that tracklists for released albums have an assumed primary source which does not require a citation. The liner notes for the album only credit Death Grips as the artist, with no further personnel or writers. A personnel section would just list the band members. If that's preferable over nothing, I'll do that. Miklogfeather (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Miklogfeather: Maybe if it's done only by band members it's not needed but it would be good to have information in the text that whole album was prepared just by band members - something like that. I don't know this album and as a reader I would like to have reference so I can easly verify it. Digital version of release would be prefered if available. Eurohunter (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]