Wikipedia:Peer review/Neuro-linguistic programming/archive4

Neuro-linguistic programming edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
It's been years since this article's last peer review. It looks like some editors made a strong push to get it upgraded to good or featured status. The page has changed significantly since then, as have Wikipedia's standards. I'd like to continue the push for at least good article status, and would appreciate any guidance.

I think the article looks reasonably complete. So my main question is if the article can be seen as neutral, and that it treats the various strong opinions with due weight and fair attribution. I'm also interested if any templates on the article are still valid, and if the references seem kosher. Anything else that might be at issue in a GA nomination is fair game.

Thanks, Vcessayist (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]