Monstercat edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am working to get this article to GA status and am looking for steps to improve the article before nomination.
Thanks, Jalen Folf (talk) 06:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thoughts from Lee V
- Hi JalenFolf. Here's a few things I picked up on.
- Lede
- "independent electronic dance music record label" - WP:SEAOFBLUE, could do with rewording/removing some links.
- The refs in the lede aren't really neccesary. Should be cited in prose.
- Is the mascot really the most important part of the article? I'd move it down the lede, if not remove entirely.
- meme should be linked.
- General prose
- I think an "overview" section wouldn't be misplaced. It jumps straight into the history of the orginasation without saying what it is, what it does, etc.
- "Beginning" is a weird title, something like "founding" makes more sense.
- Is it normal to put DOBs for people not in BLPs?
- Whilst I know British Colombia is in Canada, the article doesn't mention this is Canadian outside of the lede sentence and infobox.
- (born 1989)[4] and Ari Paunonen (born 1989/90[4]) - refs should go ideally after punctuation.
- Today, the label signs artists on a single-track basis - seems out of place on a section on origins.
- The massive quote borders on copyright issues. Even if not, it's quite promotional to copy a press release like this.
- This happens a lot
- Article is very "In X month, Y year..."
- There's some sentence structure issues, with paragraphs often being just one or two sentences.
- Does the dynamic list for the current artist land a little close to WP:FANCRUFT? Seems a little in depth for me.
- Are all the albums notable? There's some that have articles. If they are notable, they should be WP:REDLINKed.
Also be aware Earwigs CV check comes up with this: [1]
I hope some of the above is helpful to you to take the item towards GA. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)