Wikipedia:Peer review/List of United States tornado emergencies/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know what needs to be done before nominating it for featured list status.

Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 12:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My notes:
- Way, way too many "cities" listed, especially in 2011, such that many are redlinks, despite us having articles for pretty much every place in the country. Also, some of the "cities" are simply part of counties. I would remove the city column altogether and just use county.
- "N/A" means something is not applicable; "Unconfirmed" tornadoes have no rating, but that column is still applicable to them. Needs something other than "N/A", maybe just "Unk."
  - What makes "N/A" different from "EF?"
- Right now, this isn't a list of emergencies. This is a list of dates, with some emergencies linked to them.
- Why cannot sort by "Event link"?
- Why can sort by "Ref"? That's never going to be useful.
- If a tornado impacted multiple states, rowspan it, so that you don't awkwardly deal with counties from multiple states in a single cell. So, row 1: alabama counties, alabama, rowspanned tornado. row 2: tennessee counties, tennessee.
- Rowspan the "event link" cells when possible.
- April 28, 2014, needs work. Black text, misplaced refs, and somehow an "N/A" for a ref and a city; did this tornado exist or didn't it?
- Ref 265 is unhappy.
So it needs quite a bit of work. --Golbez (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]