Wikipedia:Peer review/List of NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Champions/archive1

List of NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Champions edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to work out any problems before a potential FLC nomination. I've successfully nominated lists at FLC before, but this is the first time I've created a list from scratch. Comments on the prose in the lead are particularly welcome, but any feedback would be much appreciated.

Thanks, Giants2008 (27 and counting) 15:33, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Giants2008: Peer review is backlogged at the moment, which could mean delays of up to two weeks before articles can be reviewed. You can help, by choosing one of the articles in the backlog, and reviewing it. Please consider doing this, so that delays are minimised. Brianboulton (talk) 23:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments I don't have a clue about basket but helping out with backlog. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 09:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why isn't score sortable?
"Years won" this sort after the first year won, which might not be clear per the title of the column.
What is "Triple overtime"?
"The team's result was later vacated by the NCAA because of a rules violation" reads porely
Nothing much to write about. I would consider closing the PR if I where you.

The scores are sortable now (at least by winner's score).
I'm not sure what can be done about this. Similar champion lists use varying titles for such a column, and this one seems as reasonable as any. Also, if it was sorted by number of titles won, it would be redundant since the Wins column already sorts that way.

Consider making it non-sortable. I don't see what is gained by it. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 14:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to clarify that it is three overtime periods.
Attempted to improve the wording. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 14:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nice work on the list. I'll save whatever nitpicks I can make for the FLC, but in the meantime, I'll have a go at addressing those red links. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]