Wikipedia:Peer review/Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury/archive1

Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because last year I made it into a GA. I would like to be able to put it forward for FA but I would like an independent opinion on where it specifically requires improvement to meet FA standards.

Thanks, The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Csisc edit

Dear Sir, I think personally that the article is a bit small for such good subject. I think that you should expand the History Section by involving more references and data. In fact, the article does not give a clear overview about the artistic impact of the work (influence) and it does not give the restauration process of this artistic work (Care). You should work more on this important topic. Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 13:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Csisc: Size isn't necessarily an issue with FA but can you elaborate on what sort of references and data is needed as you stated in your first comment? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 19:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The C of E: It is true that this is not the issue in itself. However, a description of the painting care of this work would be give a better overview of the Table. The sort of references required are newspaper issues about a recovery of the painting, research paper about the impact of the recovery on the table. For example, clarifying whether the recovery had affected the clarity or the colour of the painting as it had happened to the famous Da Vinci Artistic Work... --Csisc (talk) 12:10, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]