Wikipedia:Peer review/Image Lake/archive1

Image Lake edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm interested in bringing Image Lake to GA status, but I would like some feedback on the article before proceeding.

Thanks, — SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 00:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from LT910001 edit

Thanks for your edits to this article! This article certainly reads very well, and is illustrated by some beautiful pictures. For GA nomination, I'd note the following (please take with a grain of salt!):

Broadness: the article doesn't make much mention of the ecology of the area of animals/insects/plants/trees that grow here. I don't know enough about the local indigenous history, but an expanded mention of relevance to the indigenous persons of the area might be warranted.
Lead and description: relating to the above, I feel this article would benefit from an expanded description of Image lake, for example, features, wildlife, surrounding geography etc.
Readability: the article is impacted by having a lot of proper nouns, almost every sentence having 1-2 capitalised references. Suggest decapitalise compass directions, geographical epochs, and Wikilink (even to red links) the first mention of local geographical structures.
Other than that, verifiability, neutrality and images are excellent.

I'd certainly encourage you to nominate for GA when the article has been expanded a little. I hope this advice is useful! Kind regards, LT910001 (talk) 01:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]