Wikipedia:Peer review/I Need You (album)/archive1

I Need You (album) edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to a GA status and would like some input on it beforehand.

Thanks, Swifty*talkcontribs 11:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note to nominator: This is your second nomination for 7 December; WP:PR rules allow only one per day from a single nominator - please bear that in mind for the future. Brianboulton (talk) 00:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • Infobox - "1999–02" should really be "1999–2002".
  • "The album was also compared to Faith Hill's album, Breathe (1999)." is this relevant in the lead? And what were the results of the comparison?
  • "certified gold" or "certified Gold"? Be internally consistent.
  • Why don't "You Are" and "Soon" have articles?
  • "between the years 1999 and 2001" no need for "the years".
  • "At the time, during the litigation with her label" not sure you need "At the time" here at all.
  • "Rimes was asking " Rimes asked.
  • "The 2001 release of the album" repetitive from previous sentence. Suggest a merge "... Curb Records, and featured..."
  • "of four minutes and fifty-eight seconds" + "duration".
  • "a ballad[23] song" don't need "song" here.
  • "Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " followed by "Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " repetitive.
  • "that Rimes "comfortably adopting some..." not grammatically correct.
  • "saying that "The good" no need for that here.
  • "-- " replace with an en-dash.
  • "two and a half" usually see this hyphenated.
  • "did quite well on" reads too colloquially, perhaps "peformed well".
  • "it fell to" -> "falling to".
  • "Internationally the album did quite well" ditto as above comment.
  • "as high as number five" just "at number five" will do.
  • "Year-end" any need for that Y to be capitalised?
  • "as well as four other countries" the RIAA isn't a country. Perhaps "as well as in four other contries" or "as well as four other organizations".
  • Year-end charts table sorts strangely because the 2002 heading moves...
  • Sales/shipments column doesn't sort correctly.
  • Don't mix date formats in refs (e.g. ref 30, 34 etc).

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]