Wikipedia:Peer review/I Am the Best/archive1

I Am the Best edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I possibly want to take this to FAC. Any constructive comments in improving this article are appreciated.

Thanks! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 23:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Aoba47 edit

I am uncertain if I will be able to leave a full review so apologies in advance for that. I am confused by the article's mention of girl crush. The article links it to girl power, but I have never seen it used in that context. I have seen it more so used in the context of womance, and girl crush has a redirect to that article. I read the "Legacy" section of this article to try and get a better understanding of the girl crush concept in this context, and I am honestly still confused as it does not really define this image/concept. Could you clarify this for me? Aoba47 (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "girl crush" is a K-pop industry specific concept that mainly revolves around female empowerment, essentially anything that conveys a strong and independent image. This is generally contrasted with the image of cute and bubbly. "Girl crush" in K-pop doesn't actually have anything to do with womance but more resembles girl power. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That should be explained more clearly in the article (both that it is an industry specific term used in K-pop and its definition). As someone who is not familiar with K-pop at all, and I have not heard of this song either, this part was confusing to me. Further clarification would be needed, especially if you want to put this article up for a FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the link to the girl power article does not really make sense in this context then. Aoba47 (talk) 03:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I added an explanation of girl crush from a Billboard article. Would that work? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That looks better to me. Best of luck with the peer review! Aoba47 (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing now due to lack of discussion, I think its fine at GA. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]