Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurricane Iniki/archive1

Hurricane Iniki edit

This is one of the best tropical cyclone articles, and my fellow Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones editors and I would like to get some feedback on how to improve it further for a possible FAC. — jdorje (talk) 04:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As biased as it is, I like it. One thing to be improved upon could be impact on Oahu. I haven't found any yet, but there might be some out there. Hurricanehink 17:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page could be easily transferred to the {{cite web}} citation format, as it already uses Cite.php. That is a minor thing that would surely be brought up in a FAC. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 07:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There should probably be Niihau impact, if it is known. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 21:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not optimistic; those people are a pretty reclusive bunch. Just my 2 cents. -- §Hurricane E RIC§^Damagesarchive 02:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the references are fixed. What more can be expanded upon? Hurricanehink 03:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps the lead of the Impact section, but overall, it's FAC time. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 03:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - What more should be put in the lead? Hurricanehink 03:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Just a short summary of the following sections on the first paragraph. You can add one-sentence summaries about the damage on Kauai and Oahu, and that should do. The second paragraph of the lead is fine. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 03:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - I agree. Tweak that and then put it up for FAC. It's time. -- §Hurricane E RIC§^Damagesarchive 01:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Is that good for more lead? If so, I'm putting it up for FAC. Hurricanehink 15:38, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I put it up for FAC. The page is located here. Hurricanehink 19:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]