Wikipedia:Peer review/FunnymanGaitlin/archive1

FunnymanGaitlin edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because…I've only submitted one article before. This member is considered famous and I would like to get his bio and wiki page approved. It's been up for a month and still no one has reviewed. Could use any advice, review or instruction.

Thanks, Quezettcem3 (talk) 00:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from DanCherek edit

Hi there. Wikipedia articles, particularly biographies of living people (BLP), need to be built around reliable, independent secondary sources that contain significant coverage of the subject. Looking at the article's current references, I see:

FunnymanGaitlin's TikTok profile
A link to his song on Apple Music
A YouTube interview
An interview in a local Atlanta publication where all of the content comes from Gaitlin himself
Another link to his song on Apple Music
Another link to his song on Apple Music
Another link to his song on Apple Music

None of these sources make a case for the subject's notability because they are not independent. The statements about his early life and personal life that are tagged with "citation needed" should be removed per the BLP policy. I see you have removed the proposed deletion tag, but unless you add additional sources that actually cover him in detail and are independent of the subject, I think this is headed for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 19:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]