Wikipedia:Peer review/Frank L. VanderSloot/archive1

Frank L. VanderSloot edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because we have a very long section at Frank_L._VanderSloot#Melaleuca.2C_Inc.Frank_L._VanderSloot#Melaleuca.2C_Inc., which I want to divide into subsections, which could be named as follows: (1) History is on top, followed by (2) Business model, (3) Memberships and (4) Investigations. (I am not wedded to these titles; they could be changed.) The section as it is now is very disjointed and has information about various activities spread all over. Dividing the section into subsections would make for easier comprehension by readers and editing by Wikipedians.

There is opposition to this suggestion, so I am asking for neutral help from people whose interest lies only in improving the layout and practicality of WP articles. You can get a preliminary taste of the issue by going to Talk:Frank_L._VanderSloot#Rearrange_Melaleuca.2C_Inc..2C_section.

Thanks, GeorgeLouis (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]