Wikipedia:Peer review/Ferrari 250 GT Lusso/archive1

Ferrari 250 GT Lusso edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this is a translation of a FA version on fr wiki and i want to get it to GA status.

Thanks, :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Don't use spaced hyphens, use spaced en-dashes, both in the opening part of the lead and the infobox year range.
Do you have a reference for those alternative names?
Lead says it wasn't intended for grand touring but it's called GT and you've classified it in the infobox as Grand touring. Is there a ref that says it wasn't inteded to be a GT? Can you expand on this point?
What is the Ferrari "tradition"? Any reason it's in quote marks?
Link "coachbuilder" (I haven't heard this term before...!)
"mid 1964" hyphenate.
"The auto shows often provide an..." Don't think "The" is needed.
"of introducing new" -> "to introduce new".
"as only "modifications" was to be made" -> "as only modifications were to be made".
"Ferrari 250 GT SWB Berlinetta|250 GT SWB " think there's a format issue here.
"secondly - particularly - to meet " en-dash again. But a reword, "secondly, and in particular,..."
"which can be felt with regard to the weight" not particularly good English, this may need a good copyedit from someone who can write better than me.
"the GTL was negotiated in 2010 between $400,000 and $500,000." not sure I understand this, do you mean "GTLs were sold in 2010 for between $400,000 and $500,000"?
"of 250 GT and 250 GTO" missing "the" here.
"Pininfarina has led the design " remove "has".
"it also attracted personalities of that time, such as Steve McQueen." No ref, and do you mean he bought one, or just liked it?
"is responsible " was responsible, this construction happened in the past, right?
"boot lid", "bonnet" - British English, "aluminum" - US English. Be consitent.
"Typical of cut" I don't understand this.
"wings nd even the chrome bumpers" typo.
"and positioned front, vertically beneath every position light" I don't understand what this means.

I'm going to stop here. I think your best bet is a very serious copyedit, perhaps by someone who is interested in this subject matter who can interpret some of the phrases you've used here that, unfortunately, I can't quite understand. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will do the copy edit, however is [1] a RS?

You tell me, does it have any kind of editorial control over its content? Is it referenced elsewhere in other reliable sources? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As per [2], it seems that there is a editorial board. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]