Early Modern warfare edit
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has all the qualities to be a B class article and it has not been reviewed yet. Proper references, citations and accuracy has been maintined by the editors. I thus recommend and nominate this article for peer review.
Thanks, Nefirious (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but having a "B" rating merely means that an article needs more work? This is definitely in need of more citations, especially in the latter half. Please take a look at what is needed for an article to gain an GA or FA rating, which is usually an indicator of a well-crafted article.—RJH (talk) 21:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment for nominator: To clarify – peer review is primarily intended for high-quality article which have already undergone extensive work. Grade B is not an indicator of high quality. I note that you have done no work on this article; if you are seriously interested in improving its quality, I respectfully suggest that you spend some time working on it before bringing it back here for review, when I am sure your request will be acted on. At present I think this nomination is premature. Brianboulton (talk) 23:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)