Wikipedia:Peer review/Cut and run/archive1

Cut and run edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I've been considering nominating it for GA eventually, but I don't have a lot of experience in politics or language-related articles, so I'm having difficulty assessing any gaps or weaknesses. I've also been the article's only major contributor since I performed an overhaul in 2016, so it would be grand to hear a second opinion, especially because the subject matter is politically charged.

I'm generally looking for a broad second opinion, but I am a little concerned about the weight being given to various elements and about the competency of my summarizations. Some advice on usage examples—whether there's too many, there could stand to be more non-fiction literary, some literary could be swapped out for older ones, more other political speeches—would be appreciated; the wikisource texts on the talk page may be of use there. Thanks, ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 02:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TenTonParasol, I am sorry that no one has responded to this PR yet. I am the wrong editor to look at this because I know very little about ships. However, there is an active Wikiproject at WP:SHIPS with lots of editors that are writing GAs and FAs at the moment. I suggest posting a message on that talk page asking someone to review this article. Z1720 (talk) 18:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TenTonParasol, did you reach out to anyone to review this? Are you still interested in getting comments? Z1720 (talk) 14:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I got totally distracted and forgot to. I'm wondering if WP:SHIPS is the best place, considering the bulk of the article and my concerns don't actually have to do with the nautical usage of the term and more its usage in political rhetoric. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 14:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are looking for politics people, consider WP:POLITICS I also suggest going to WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, and databases provided by your local library system to get more sources and information. Z1720 (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem with sourcing information, because I am indeed aware of those resources (and have indeed used most of them to build this specific article). My concerns are largely about balance and treatment, but I will indeed ask at the WikiProject. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 15:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mention the sources because it is a shorter article, and there might be more information out there to add to its prose. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]