Constantinople edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
Given the article has an active community of contributors, it may be interest to fellow editors in working to solicit a compendium of feedback on how to further advance the article, perhaps with a long term end goal of reinstating this page with the criteria required of reassessment for a'Good Article.'
Being part of the discussion which imposed the maintenance template, it should be a goal to flesh out the verifiability of this page, which is at a deficit in its current state.
Discussion on the topographical features, of which scholarship is rather plentiful, is sparse on this page. My personal suggestion is to establish a decent synthesis between this page and the already extant pages on said topographical features of the cities such as monuments and buildings, though I am still unsure whether some sort of index or a map may be more relevant to making that project navigable. A long term question may be a discussion on what topics deserve to be split off for their own pages, but the page may need to be more expanded for that to be relevant.