Wikipedia:Peer review/Apostles of Linnaeus/archive1

Apostles of Linnaeus edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have the intention of making this my first Featured List. I normally do not work with lists and am thus not very experienced. I need help with developing the article to FL standard since I am not sure if it is OK as it is or if it needs more info etc.

Thanks, Esuzu (talk • contribs) 14:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Are you sure that the list format is the best way of treating this article. Given the very substantial amounts of text within the list as drafted, this looks to me as though it could or should be organised as a straight article. Comments? Brianboulton (talk) 23:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been thinking on that for some time but have not dared to make any change. I would gladly re-organise it. The reason I kept the list was because about some apostles very little information can be found but I guess that might be no problem. Thank you for your comment. Esuzu (talk • contribs) 14:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it's of any help to you, a couple of years ago I was preparing Farthest South, a list of convergences on the South Pole from Magellan to Scott & Amundsen, involving some fifteen expeditions. I soon realised that the list format was not appropriate, and made it into an article. Something similar may work here. Brianboulton (talk) 22:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is very helpful! Thank you. I will make it into an article as soon as time allows me. Esuzu (talk • contribs) 14:34, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to give me a ping when this is ready, and I'll be happy to review it. Brianboulton (talk) 20:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be perfect. Once I am ready with the re-construction I will ping you. Cheers, Esuzu (talk • contribs) 20:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]