Wikipedia:Peer review/12 Angry Men/archive1

12 Angry Men edit

The article may or may not be complete; it has languished for some time and very few edits have been made. A peer review would be appreciated. --RogerK 02:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plot usually goes first. AndyZ 20:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this article was written before Wikiproject Films came into existence, and as such it was written with an introduction. If, however, you feel that it should be rearranged, please do so. RogerK 05:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good article, though it would be considered too short to be considered for Feature Article status in its current state. Providing additional information as to how and in what context (social/political) the movie was made in would give it some of the extra depth it needs. Also, placing this in the director's overall output, and how it is typical (or not) would be helpful. Would also be good to add any references you can find to contemporary critical reaction, as opposed to the more current references you link to. Another suggestion: since the Tony Hancock reference is not directly related to the film, I suggest you put it in a "Trivia" or "Parodies" heading instead (am pretty sure there was a Goon Show episode that parodied it as well). Cheers! Captmondo 14:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will try to follow up on your suggestions. RogerK 01:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]