Wikipedia:Peer review/10th millennium BC/archive2

10th millennium BC edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

Hi! I've listed this article for peer review because I'm considering applying for this article to get in the FA, but first I need feedback on improving the 10th millennium BC page. I feel like it can be in the FA if there is more information and sources, but I want to see what someone thinks about the page so far. You can review any section, but it would be really appreciated if you looked through the whole article. I didn't really change anything that was made before. So far, I just added some things to the page, so there can be a bit more content in some parts. Right now, the page has 30k bytes which is not bad imo. This is the first time I have ever done a peer review so hopefully, I can improve on helping Wikipedia over time. Thanks for reading this review application.

Thanks, FerdinandLovesLegos (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CactiStaccingCrane edit

User:FerdinandLovesLegos I would suggest contacting Wikipedia:WikiProject Years for more advice on how to improve the article. No "years" or "millennium" have been a featured article/list yet, but you can take a look at 1346 and 9th millennium BC for inspiration. CactiStaccingCrane 15:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I will contact the Wikiepdia:WikiProject Years for more advice on how to improve the article I'm working on. I did notice that no Year pages reached FA yet, but hopefully, that will change soon. Thanks for letting me know! FerdinandLovesLegos (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template.

Since you are still working on nominating your first FA, I would suggest seeking a FA mentor. They can comment on this PR and guide you through the FAC process. Z1720 (talk) 20:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. If this article somehow gets into the FA, I will be shocked tbh. Also, I'm working on getting the 8th millennium BC page to Good Article quality soon as well. FerdinandLovesLegos (talk) 02:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FerdinandLovesLegos: It's been over a month since the last comment on this PR. Can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'm not working on the 10th millennium BC right now, so it's fine to close it. FerdinandLovesLegos (talk) 23:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]