Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Vere Bird Jr./1

Vere Bird Jr. edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Kept No reason given for delisting Aircorn (talk) 03:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the GA status being almost or even over 10 years old and the person who rated it is banned, it should be time to review it again. I said that it could be a C or even a B but it is no longer GA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoonlightVector (talkcontribs)

  • MoonlightVector, could you specify which part of the GA criteria you don't think is met here? Currently there's an active cleanup tag but it's not immediately clear to me what needs to be cleaned up. Article organization looks OK. (t · c) buidhe 03:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MoonlightVector: I tend to agree with Buidhe as the article looks pretty well organised to me. Some edits have been done since the review so maybe they fixed a few issues. Also we need more info, specifically how it fails one or more of the WP:GACR before we can delist. The age of the status or nominator being banned is not relevant (unless they were banned when they passed the article). Aircorn (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]