Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sivaji (film)/1
Sivaji (film) edit
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Kept, all the notes were fulfilled by the main editor.--Retrohead (talk) 18:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I have listed this article for GA reassessment because it was badly damaged by edit wars, content deletion and info not up-to-date (possibility of dead links). I want to therefore improve it. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 13:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comments from Kailash29792
- Lead
- Empty the lead of ref's as per WP:LEAD. But the same content must exist in the body with ref's.
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Let the most notable cast members stay in the lead.
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox film has a parameter "screenplay" which has not been utilised here.
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Do some general copyediting, or at least remove whatever sounds informal, colloquial, figurative or idiomatic.
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Plot
- Seems fine, a few edits by a GOCE member should make it look best.
- Cast
- Let the most notable members stay, while minor ones may also, if there is any source to prove their inclusion.
Done Most notable members staying. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Production
- Does this image satisfy WP:NFCC? I don't think so, and it should be uploaded through Commons with permission from the image's owner, who is The Hindu!
Done Removed the image. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Release
- This section needs serious copyediting, and "bagged" is not formal. Also, mention the Censor Board by its full name - the Central Board of Film Certification.
Done Lstanley1979 has done a c/e on this section. CBFC expanded to Central Board of Film Certification. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 07:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Box office
- Information on the film's release can be shifted to "release".
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- "It grossed $101,779 in its full run in South Africa." - source?
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- 3D conversion
- This section can be renamed to "3D re-release".
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Critical response
- Many review sites are not referred to here by name, when they should be.
Done named review sites. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Accolades
- Source the entire section.
Done sourced. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- In Popular Culture
- Decapitalise "Popular Culture", and expand upon the content.
Done removed the section. Placed it in my sandbox. Will expand upon the content when I go for FAC. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Soundtrack
- This section better come after "Production" and before "Release".
Done as asked. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I think the other mishaps in the article are glaring and explicit enough for you to correct. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comments
Some minor points:
- I suggest to merge the lead into three paragraphs.
- "Shankar was paid a record salary of ₹ 30 million for this project". In the sentence, you do not need to have space after {{INR}} and so with the succeeding one.
- I suggest to tweak one of the sentences that have "record salary" as both look almost same thing.
- In the casting section, Nayantara and Asin need to be linked.
- I suggest to shift the sentence from the sub-section "Visual effects". The sub-section is not needed when it has only one sentence.
- The full stop (.) is missing in the first sentence of Release section.
- "The kanjira is a South Indian frame drum, is an instrument of the tambourine family." does not look sound to me. --FrankBoy (Buzz) 12:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Done All of the above comments have been resolved. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 13:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)